Graduate Research School HDR Advisors Progressing Candidates Guidelines for Placing a HDR Candidate Under Review
Guidelines for Placing a HDR Candidate Under Review
- Aboriginals and Torres Strait Islanders in Marine Science
- Courses
- Future Students
- Current Students
- Research and Teaching
- Partners and Community
- About JCU
- Reputation and Experience
- Celebrating 50 Years
- Academy
- Anthropological Laboratory for Tropical Audiovisual Research (ALTAR)
- Anton Breinl Research Centre
- Agriculture Technology and Adoption Centre (AgTAC)
- Living on Campus
- How to apply
- Advanced Analytical Centre
- Alumni
- AMHHEC
- JCU Aquaculture Solutions
- AusAsian Mental Health Research Group
- ARCSTA
- Area 61
- Association of Australian University Secretaries
- Australian Lions Stinger Research
- Australian Tropical Herbarium
- Australian Quantum & Classical Transport Physics Group
- Boating and Diving
- JCU-CSIRO Partnership
- Employability Edge
- Career Ready Plan
- Careers at JCU
- Careers and Employability
- Chancellery
- Centre for Tropical Bioinformatics and Molecular Biology
- CITBA
- CMT
- CASE
- College of Business, Law and Governance
- College of Healthcare Sciences
- College of Medicine and Dentistry
- College of Science and Engineering
- CPHMVS
- Centre for Disaster Solutions
- CSTFA
- Cyber Security Hub
- Cyclone Testing Station
- The Centre for Disaster Studies
- Daintree Rainforest Observatory
- Discover Nature at JCU
- Research Division
- Services and Resources Division
- Education Division
- Elite Athletes
- eResearch
- Environmental Research Complex [ERC]
- Estate
- Fletcherview
- Foundation for Australian Literary Studies
- Gender Equity Action and Research
- General Practice and Rural Medicine
- JC 'U' Orientation
- Give to JCU
- Governance
- Information for JCU Cairns Graduates
- Art of Academic Writing
- Art of Academic Editing
- Graduate Research School
- Graduation
- Indigenous Education and Research Centre
- Indigenous Engagement
- Indigenous Legal Needs Project
- Inherent Requirements
- IsoTropics Geochemistry Lab
- IT Services
- International Schools
- International Students
- Research and Innovation Services
- JCU Eduquarium
- JCU Events
- JCU Global Experience
- JCU Ideas Lab
- JCU Job Ready
- JCU Motorsports
- JCU Prizes
- JCU Sport
- JCU Turtle Health Research
- Language and Culture Research Centre
- CEE
- LearnJCU
- Library
- Mabo Decision: 30 years on
- MARF
- Marine Geophysics Laboratory
- New students
- Off-Campus Students
- Office of the Vice Chancellor and President
- Virtual Open Day
- Orpheus
- Outstanding Alumni
- Parents and Partners
- Pathways to university
- Planning for your future
- Placements
- Policy
- PAHL
- Publications
- Professional Experience Placement
- Queensland Research Centre for Peripheral Vascular Disease
- Rapid Assessment Unit
- RDIM
- Researcher Development Portal
- Safety and Wellbeing
- Scholarships
- Contextual Science for Tropical Coastal Ecosystems
- Staff
- State of the Tropics
- Strategic Procurement
- Student Equity and Wellbeing
- Student profiles
- SWIRLnet
- TARL
- TESS
- TREAD
- TropEco for Staff and Students
- TQ Maths Hub
- TUDLab
- Unicare Centre and Unicampus Kids
- UAV
- VAVS Home
- Work Health and Safety
- WHOCC for Vector-borne & NTDs
- Media
- Copyright and Terms of Use
- Australian Institute of Tropical Health & Medicine
- Clinical Psychedelic Research Lab
The following guidelines apply to an Advisor(s) who wishes to place their JCU HDR candidate Under Review.
1. Ensure you have read and understood the HDR Under Review Procedure and Under Review section of the HDR Requirements before you contact the Graduate Research School.
2. Provide a statement of reasons for recommending that a candidate be placed Under Review. Your statement must address the following:
The reason(s) why the recommendation is being made, e.g. the candidate has failed to complete their required work over a six month period and has missed three of the last five scheduled Advisory Panel meetings.
What actions you have undertaken prior to this point to attempt to address the issues or reasons for the recommendation. Have you asked the candidate if there are reasons for their lack of progress that they are aware of? Have you attempted to communicate with the candidate by email and phone without success?
What indications you have given the candidate that their progress is not satisfactory or as expected, and if you have given the candidate an indication that you will be recommending that they be placed Under Review.
Evidence pertaining to the above such as copies of email communications and meeting notes. It is essential that you advise the candidate of your concerns and suggestions to address these concerns in writing as well as in meetings over a period of at least several weeks before you recommend to your College that the candidate be placed Under Review, unless such a recommendation is made in the context of a formal Progress Report.
The recommended period of Review for the candidate. The maximum initial duration is six months.
You must be aware that the information provided in your statement will be used in the formal notification to be provided to the candidate prior to them being placed Under Review.
3. Ensure the candidate will be available during the Under Review period, during which they will be required to develop and finalise a Candidature Management Plan. The candidate will be reasonably available or have made suitable alternative arrangements during the Under Review period.