You and Your CourseOpportunities
Research and Teaching
Our ResearchResearch Degrees
Partners and Community
Partner with JCU
- Careers and Employability
- Open Day
- Australian Institute of Tropical Health & Medicine
- Explore Grants and Funding
Partner and collaborate with us
Research Contracts & Consultancies
Innovate: open doors for your business idea
- Intellectual Property
- Discover our Facilities
- Contact Us
Ethics and Integrity
- Low/Negligible Risk Applications
- Closing Dates for Submission of Human Ethics Applications
- Getting help from Human Ethics Advisors
- Health Service Districts and External HREC Approvals
- How to submit a human research ethics application: Full HREC review
- Human Research Ethics
- Human Ethics Advisors
- Complaints and Unexpected Events
Animal Welfare and Ethics
Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Research Ethics
- Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Ethics Advisors
- Who has to submit an application?
- How to Submit an Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Ethics Application
- Closing Dates
- Best Practice
- Getting help from Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Ethics Advisors
- Roles and Responsibilities - Indigenous Research
- Forms and Resources
- Research Code of Conduct
- Defence Trade Controls
- Human Ethics
Checklist for a winning a grant
Have you found out about the scheme in relation to assessment criteria, eligibility of all applicants, priority areas, average success rates, the average value of grants, duration of funding, length of the proposal and special instructions?
Have you allowed sufficient time to write, review and gain feedback from peers, mentors and/or JCU Connect?
Have you included a central, important, original question, goal or hypothesis? Is there a rationale for this?
Is your research plan organised and logical? Is it definite, yet flexible? Does it lead to a solution?
Is your project feasible and realistic? (Not excessively ambitious or grandiose)
Do you possess and have you highlighted a better than average track record, a pilot study or evidence of preliminary results?
Is your budget reasonable, believable and justified? Have you included well-argued reasons for requested equipment, consumables, maintenance, and other items?
Does your project have integrity? (No plagiarism, exaggerated claims, overlap, selective referencing)
Does your application carefully adhere to the guidelines, rules, format (margins, font size) and the funding objectives of the scheme?
Is the presentation of your proposal sound? Have you used short paragraphs, frequent headings, and clear diagrams?
Is your writing simple, direct and concise? Does it flow logically? Are there any flaws in your argument?
Have you checked for any evidence of poor expression, grammar or spelling errors?
Have you obtained feedback concerning your proposal or critical review from peers?
What Makes Proposals Uncompetitive
Research proposals are uncompetitive or fail because they lack qualities such as originality, rationality, simplicity, clarity, feasibility, and integrity.
Other reasons may include:
The expression is poor and project aims are unclear;
A weak hypothesis;
The project lacks innovation;
The steps and processes in the project are flawed;
The project is unlikely to lead to the stated outcomes and there is insufficient evidence that the project is achievable;
The milestones and the timeframe are inappropriate;
There is insufficient evidence for including novel approaches;
There is an inadequate demonstration of the Chief Investigator's experience and/or productivity;
There is insufficient time dedicated by the Chief Investigator;
The applicant fails to meet the needs or requirements of the funding agency.