Policy Research Education Higher Degree by Research Code of Practice
Higher Degree by Research Code of Practice
- Aboriginals and Torres Strait Islanders in Marine Science
- Courses
- Future Students
- Current Students
- Research and Teaching
- Partners and Community
- About JCU
- Reputation and Experience
- Celebrating 50 Years
- ALTAR
- Anton Breinl Research Centre
- Agriculture Technology and Adoption Centre
- Living on Campus
- Advanced Prawn Breeding Research Hub
- Advanced Analytical Centre
- Applying to JCU
- Alumni
- AMHHEC
- JCU Aquaculture Solutions
- AusAsian Mental Health Research Group
- ARCSTA
- Area 61
- Association of Australian University Secretaries
- Australian/NZ Students
- Australian Lions Stinger Research
- Boating and Diving
- ATSIP
- Employability Edge
- Australian Tropical Herbarium
- Careers at JCU
- Careers and Employability
- Australian Quantum & Classical Transport Physics Group
- Centre for Tropical Bioinformatics and Molecular Biology
- CITBA
- Chancellery
- CMT
- CASE
- College of Business, Law and Governance
- College of Healthcare Sciences
- WHOCC for N&M Education and Research
- College of Medicine and Dentistry
- College of Science and Engineering
- CPHMVS
- COVID-19 Advice
- Centre for Disaster Solutions
- CSTFA
- Cyclone Testing Station
- The Centre for Disaster Studies
- Daintree Rainforest Observatory
- Diploma of Higher Education
- Discover Nature at JCU
- Research Division
- Services and Resources Division
- Education Division
- Division of Tropical Environments and Societies
- Division of Tropical Health and Medicine
- Economic Geology Research Centre
- Elite Athletes
- eResearch
- ERC
- Estate
- Financial and Business Services Office
- Fletcherview
- Foundation for Australian Literary Studies
- Gender Equity Action and Research
- GetReady4Uni
- Give to JCU
- Governance
- Information for JCU Cairns Graduates
- Graduate Research School
- Graduation
- Indigenous Education and Research Centre
- Indigenous Engagement
- Indigenous Legal Needs Project
- Inherent Requirements
- IsoTropics Geochemistry Lab
- IT Services
- International Schools
- International Students
- JCU Connect
- JCU Eduquarium
- JCU Events
- JCU Global Experience
- JCU Ideas Lab
- JCU Job Ready
- JCU Motorsports
- JCU Prizes
- JCU Sport
- JCU Turtle Health Research
- Language and Culture Research Centre
- CEE
- LearnJCU
- Library
- Mabo Decision: 30 years on
- MARF
- Marine Geophysics Laboratory
- New students
- Off-Campus Students
- Office of the Vice Chancellor and President
- Virtual Open Day
- Orpheus
- Outstanding Alumni Awards
- Parents and Partners
- Pathways to university
- Planning for your future
- Placements
-
Policy
- Academic Governance
- Academic Management
- Community, Marketing and Alumni
-
Corporate Governance
- Academic Freedom and Freedom of Speech Policy
- Affiliation of a Residential College Policy
- Bullying, Discrimination, Harassment, and Sexual Misconduct Policy
- Business Continuity Policy
- Child Safety Policy
- Code of Conduct – University Council
- Compliance Policy
- Conduct of Council Elections Policy
- Conflicts of Interests Policy – University Council and its Committees
- Controlled and Non-Controlled Entities Policy
- Critical Incident Policy
- Data Governance Policy
- Distinguished Professor Policy
- Domestic and Family Violence Policy
- Emeritus Professor Policy
- Foreign Interference Policy
- General Practice Training Governance Policy
- Incident Management Policy
- Information Privacy Policy
- Legal Services Claims and Litigation Assistance Policy
- Organisational Structure Policy
- Records Management Policy
- Right to Information Policy
- Risk Management Policy
- Social Media Policy
- Staff Code of Conduct
- University Archives - Access
- University Seal Policy
- Visiting Speaker and Event Policy
-
Estate and Facility Management
- Advertising on Campus
- Alcohol Consumption on University Property
- Approval of Works to University Buildings and Site Infrastructure
- Authorised Use of University Facilities, Premises and/or Grounds for Non-core Purposes
- Environmental Policy
- High Voltage Access Policy
- Memorial Plaques
- Noise on University Sites
- Pets on Campus
- Real Estate Dealings Policy
- Security Policy
- Space Allocation and Management Policy
- Timetable and Class Registration Policy
- Tree Protection
- Vehicle Fleet Policy
- Weapons Policy
-
Financial Management
- Appendices
-
Assets (FMPM 200 - FMPM 399)
- FMPM 200 Overview - Assets & Cash Management
- FMPM 210 Cash
- FMPM 220 Policy - Bank Accounts
- FMPM 230 - Petty Cash Advances
- FMPM 300 Investments
- FMPM 320 Plant and Equipment
- Financial FMPM 322 - Acquisitions of Plant and Equipment
- FMPM 260 Other Advances
- FMPM 330 Non-Capital Assets
- FMPM 280 Official Stores
- FMPM 290 Prepayments
- FMPM 323 - Disposal of Property, Plant and Equipment Procedure
- FMPM 324 Stocktake
- FMPM 350 Intangible Assets
- FMPM 270-2 Accounts Receivable - Student Debtors - Penalties
- FMPM 240 Travel Advances (Students)
- FMPM 330 Non-Capital Assets
- FMPM 270-1 Accounts Receivable
- FMPM 250 - Policy Salary Advances
- Equity (FMPM 500 - FMPM 599)
- Expenses (FMPM 700 - FMPM799)
- Financial Management and Control (FMPM 800 - FMPM 899)
- Further Applications (FMPM 900 - FMPM 999)
- Introduction (FMPM 100 - FMPM 199)
- Liabilities (FMPM 400 - FMPM 499)
- Revenue (FMPM 600 - FMPM 699)
-
Human Resources
- Academic Promotion Policy
- Awards for Excellence Policy
- Bullying, Discrimination, Harassment, and Sexual Misconduct Policy
- Community and Indigenous Language Allowance
- Competency Pay for Tradespersons Policy
- Conflict of Interest Policy
- Early Retirement Policy
- Enterprise Agreement 2016
- Equal Employment Opportunity
- Honorary Appointments Policy
- Human Resources Policy Glossary
- Market Loading Policy
- Optional Working Hours System (Op-Time)
- Overpayment of Wages Policy
- Performance, Development and Recognition Policy
- Recruitment, Selection and Appointment Policy
- Relocation Assistance Policy
- Remote Working Policy
- Salary Packaging Program Policy
- Special Studies Program Policy
- Supported Wage System (SWS) Policy
- Digital Infrastructure
-
International
- Attendance Monitoring Policy - English Language and Foundation Programs
- Enrolment Requirements for International Student Visa-Holders Policy
- Management of Off-Campus Operations, Ventures and Partnerships
- Transfer of International Student Visa Holders to Other Educational Institutions
- US Federal Student Aid-SAP & Return to Title IV Policy
-
Learning and Teaching
- Blended Learning Policy
- Charter of Responsibilities for Academic Quality and Governance
- Coursework Academic Integrity Policy
- Curriculum Approval, Accreditation, Monitoring, Review and Improvement Policy
- English Language and Numeracy Policy
- Graduate Attributes
- Graduate Certificate of Education (Academic Practice) Internal Sponsorship Policy
- Learning Teaching and Assessment Policy
- Policy Glossary
- Review of a Student’s Suitability to Continue a Course Involving Placement
- Student Digital Experience Policy
- Student Evaluation of Subjects and Teaching Policy
- Student Retention Policy
- Coursework Approval, Accreditation and Review Policy
- Quality and Planning
- Research Education
- Research Management
-
Student Matters
- Academic Progression Policy
- Administration of Commonwealth Scholarships Policy
- Admissions Policy
- Attendance Monitoring Policy - English Language and Foundation Programs
- Award Finalisation and Graduation Policy
- Bullying, Discrimination, Harassment, and Sexual Misconduct Policy
- Copyright Policy and Procedure
- Coursework Enrolment Policy
- Coursework Scholarships, Grants and Prizes Policy
- Enrolment Requirements for International Student Visa-Holders Policy
- Intervention Strategy for Students Who Have Not Made Satisfactory Academic Progress
- Library Use Policy
- Student Code of Conduct
- Student Complaints Policy
- Student Disability Policy
- Student Fee Payments and Refunds Policy
- Student Results Policy
- Student Review and Appeals Policy (effective from 01/01/2023)
- Student Review and Appeals Policy (effective to 31/12/2022)
- Student Special Circumstances Policy
- Transfer of International Student Visa Holders to Other Educational Institutions
- Work Health and Safety
- Policy search
- PAHL
- Publications
- Professional Experience Placement
- Queensland Research Centre for Peripheral Vascular Disease
- Rapid Assessment Unit
- RDIM
- Researcher Development Portal
- Safety and Wellbeing
- Scholarships
- Contextual Science for Tropical Coastal Ecosystems
- Staff
- State of the Tropics
- Strategic Procurement
- Student Equity and Wellbeing
- Student profiles
- SWIRLnet
- TARL
- TESS
- TREAD
- TropEco
- TQ Maths Hub
- TUDLab
- Unicare Centre and Unicampus Kids
- UAV
- VAVS Home
- Work Health and Safety
- WHOCC for Vector-borne & NTDs
- Media
- Copyright and Terms of Use
- Australian Institute of Tropical Health & Medicine
One of the major functions of a university is to provide education and training in research and scholarship. Indeed, universities are the only institutions that are funded directly by the Australian Government to engage in research training for degree purposes. The institutional purpose is to graduate students whose research skills equip them to perform successfully in both academic and industrial environments in a global context. In turn, the work of research higher degree candidates (HDR candidates) is essential for the intellectual vibrancy of the institution and constitutes a powerful driver of research capability.
University research training involves the active participation of both staff and HDR candidates. The task of ensuring that research training is conducted in the most efficient and effective manner is shared by all parties: the institution, its academic staff and HDR candidates all have legitimate expectations of each other. University policy in the area of research and research education is designed to provide a set of principles and statements of good practice with respect to matters such as supervision, college management, infrastructure support, monitoring of progress, and examinations. The policies incorporate reasonable student expectations about their research training. The completion of a research higher degree represents a considerable investment from several sources that always include the HDR candidate, their family, and the University, and may also include industry partners, and Australian and/or other governments. The purpose of this document is to set out the HDR candidate’s expectations of University research higher degree training, and the corresponding expectations that the University has of its HDR candidates.
1. HDR Candidate Expectations
1.1 General
HDR candidates can expect:
1.1.1 Representation in relevant forums at college, division and University levels;
1.1.2 Opportunities to form scholarly relationships with staff in an environment of mutual respect and trust;
1.1.3 Information on University, division and college policies on matters such as enrolment, resources, research and professional ethics, intellectual property, and workplace health and safety;
1.1.4 Access to library support, information services and IT infrastructure;
1.1.5 Access to training in the skills necessary to complete their thesis and to prepare them for their chosen career in research, academia or industry;
1.1.6 Equitable access to the basic resources required for their project;
1.1.7 Access to academic and personal counselling;
1.1.8 Appropriate mediation and/or resolution of grievances that are related to candidature;
1.1.9 Information on the appeals processes relating to candidature milestones and the examination of theses and to be able to appeal the recommendations of these processes where there is some doubt or suggestion that due process was not observed. (see Student Review and Appeals Policy)
1.2 Relationship with the Advisory Panel
HDR candidates can expect:
1.2.1 To be supervised by a staff member who is engaged actively in research in the general field;
1.2.2 That high quality supervision can be provided and maintained throughout the research period;
1.2.3 That Advisors will assist them in selecting their topics and planning the study program, including career planning and professional development;
1.2.4 That Advisors will provide guidance about the nature and scope of the research, relevant literature sources and methodology, and the expected standard of research, analysis, writing, and presentation;
1.2.5 That Advisors will, on behalf of the college and the University, monitor the HDR candidate’s progress relative to the standard required for the degree, and constructively advise the HDR candidate when progress falls below the standard generally expected;
1.2.6 To have access to reasonable levels of ongoing advice and support from all members of their Advisory Panel, bearing in mind that primary responsibility for their candidature remains with the Primary Advisor;
1.2.7 To have regular access to all members of the Advisory Panel as agreed at the beginning of candidature, preferably via a formal agreement between candidate and advisors;
1.2.8 To be given, at the beginning of candidature, the criteria on which decisions about each of the candidature milestones will be made;
1.2.9 That Advisors will encourage attendance at relevant conferences and will assist in the preparation of work for publication or other appropriate forms of dissemination. (The University will provide assistance to attend relevant conferences in accordance with the Minimum Standard of Resources and Facilities and other Support Provided for HDR candidates procedure; (https://www.jcu.edu.au/graduate-research-school/forms-and-policies/hdr-minimum-standard-or-resources,-facilities-and-other-support-procedure)
1.2.10 That Advisors will maintain a mutually-agreed level of contact and that agreed-upon submission of work can continue when members of the Advisory Panel or the HDR candidates is away from the University campus;
1.2.11 That Advisors will discuss outlines and read drafts of theses to advise the student about the acceptable standard of scholarly and technical presentation in a timely manner, preferably agreed in a formal agreement between the candidate and advisors.
1.3 College Support
HDR candidate can expect:
1.3.1 To be able to identify poor supervision without reprisal and to have valid complaints investigated promptly;
1.3.2 Frankness in relation to the college’s ability to offer appropriate supervision, funding for direct research costs, and appropriate infrastructure support;
1.3.3 To be informed prior to enrolment of all financial and supervisory arrangements which might affect them and the proposed project. Such arrangements could include external grant funds and externally funded scholarships, factors that might impact on funding continuity and foreseeable interruptions to the availability of members of the Advisory Panel;
1.3.4 To be informed at the time of enrolment of intellectual property, confidentiality and authorship considerations and how these matters will be handled in the event that candidature is terminated, the HDR candidate changes Advisors, college or university, or the HDR candidate withdraws from candidature;
1.3.5 To be informed, prior to enrolment, of the implications that third party involvement might have for the candidate’s project. These could include, for example, the rights of the third party, the level of commitment the third party has to continuance of the project, and the effects of the withdrawal of the third party during the course of the project;
1.3.6 To receive resources for their project at least at a level, which accords with the University’s approved policy on the Minimum Standard of Resources and Facilities and other Support Provided for HDR candidates (https://www.jcu.edu.au/graduate-research-school/forms-and-policies/hdr-minimum-standard-or-resources,-facilities-and-other-support-procedure);
1.3.7 To be advised as soon as possible of any changes to funding arrangements that may affect the conduct of their research and/or stipend support.
2. University Expectations
2.1 General
The University expects advisors and HDR candidate to be familiar with and adhere to relevant University rules, policies, guidelines and codes of conduct, wherever they are applicable to postgraduate work. In particular students should be familiar with policies on Student Conduct, Bullying, Discrimination, Harassment and Sexual Misconduct, conduct of research, intellectual property, work health and safety, and the requirements for data lodgement.
2.1.1 The JCU Code of Conduct states that staff must “avoid placing [themselves] in direct positions of responsibility relating to the employment or studies of a person, where [they]{ have, or have had, a close personal relationship with that person”. Hence Advisory Panel members must not have a marital, de facto, sexual or close family relationship with the candidate, nor should there be any reason to believe that there is such a relationship between an Advisor and a HDR Candidate. If such circumstances arise during the candidature, both parties must inform one of the ADRE, Dean of College or Dean, Graduate Research within 10 working days to make consequential changes to the Advisory Panel and any other necessary arrangements.
2.2 HDR candidates can be expected to:
2.2.1 Take an active, self-motivated approach to research seeking input from other staff and HDR candidate when possible; and, while acknowledging that the Advisors’ input and guidance are crucial, accept final responsibility for the research and the thesis;
2.2.2 Follow University guidelines and regulations pertaining to their degrees, in particular to comply with the contents of any guidelines or handbook for HDR Candidates, and the contractual obligations associated with any third party funding of their research to raise any questions or concerns with Advisors, Associate Dean Research Education in their college, College Dean, or Dean or Deputy Dean of Graduate Research, as appropriate in the context;
2.2.3 Develop their transferable skills in the context of their career aspirations and University policy on professional development for HDR candidates;
2.2.4 Treat University facilities and equipment used in research with due care and in an appropriate manner;
2.2.5 Obtain ethical clearances or permits for their research wherever necessary and abide by workplace health and safety policies and procedures as required;
2.2.6 Keep abreast of the latest literature in the research field in order to be aware of any developments affecting the project and to maintain a broad knowledge of the field;
2.2.7 Conduct their research in an ethical manner;
2.2.8 Accede to reasonable requests from relevant university staff with respect to their candidature and research;
2.2.8 Have verbal and written competence in academic English at a level appropriate for the production of a thesis and for the reporting of research results;
2.1.10 See that final drafts are proofread and edited to an acceptable scholarly standard for submission;
2.2.11 Lodge a copy of their aggregate data in the college in which the data were generated.
2.3 Relationship with the Advisory Panel
HDR candidates can be expected to:
2.3.1 Maintain a mutually agreed level of contact with their Advisory Panel, preferably as agreed through a formal agreement between the candidate and advisors, attend meetings prepared to make clear statements about ideas, progress and problems, and continue the agreed-upon schedule for contact and for submission of work when away from the University campus on field work or research trips;
2.3.2 Refrain from embarking on any significant variation to the topic unless agreed with the Advisory Panel;
2.3.3 Submit regular drafts of work as agreed with the Advisory Panel, and to allow their Advisors a reasonable amount of time to read and comment in detail, (preferably as defined in a formal agreement between the candidate and advisors). Written work should be submitted before advisory meetings;
2.3.4 Inform the Advisory Panel of any personal or other difficulties (without necessarily specifying the details) which have slowed or may slow progress;
2.3.5 Be aware that if significant and intractable problems in the Advisory Panel- HDR candidate relationship should arise which cannot be resolved by discussion, the Associate Dean Research Education in their college in the first instance and if necessary the Dean of College and the Dean or Deputy Dean of Graduate Research should be consulted;
2.3.6 If they are off-campus students, establish and maintain a suitable means of regular contact with their Advisory Panel.
2.4 College Activities
HDR candidate can be expected to:
2.4.1 Present and attend such seminars as required;
2.4.2 Attend such courses as are specified by the college;
2.4.3 Treat all colleagues, HDR candidate, students and staff with respect;
2.4.4 Contribute to the intellectual and social life of the college by participation in activities such as meetings of the Postgraduate Student Committee and by attendance at research seminars, discussion groups and other academic functions;
2.4.5 Wherever possible attend and present work at relevant conferences and to publish work in appropriate scholarly outlets.
2.5 University Procedures
HDR candidate can be expected to:
2.5.1 Pursue work diligently with a view to completing their thesis within the specified time, and with a minimum of interruption;
2.5.2 Submit timely and accurate progress reports as required;
2.5.3 Ensure that no plagiarism or other form of academic misconduct is committed;
2.5.4 Ensure that the presentation and format of their thesis meets the University's requirements as set out in the current Graduate Research School procedures; and to submit their thesis in a form suitable for examination, that follows the protocols of scholarly presentation appropriate to the discipline and is, as far as possible, free of grammatical, spelling, and typographical errors.
2.6 Compliance with HDR Code of Practice
2.6.1 The University is committed to providing HDR Candidates and their Advisors with access to education and training in relation to the requirements of this code.
2.6.2 Where uncertain about the application or interpretation of this code, HDR Candidates and their Advisors should consult with the Associate Dean Research Education in their college in the first instance and if necessary the Dean of College and the Dean or Deputy Dean of Graduate Research as appropriate.
2.6.3 Failure to comply with this code may lead to disciplinary action, and in serious cases may lead to termination of candidature and/or criminal prosecution.
Related Documents
Bullying, Discrimination, Harassment and Sexual Misconduct Policy
Code for the Responsible Conduct of Research
Health, Safety and Environment Policy
Intellectual Property Policy and Procedure
Student Review and Appeals Policy
Approval Details
Policy sponsor: | DVC Research |
Approval authority: | Academic Board |
Date for next review: | 06/11/2022 |
Modification History
Version no. | Approval date | Implementation date | Details | Author |
18-3 | 01/11/2018 | 03/12/2018 | Minor amendment to reflect establishment of Student Appeals Policy | Chair of Academic Board |
18-2 | 30/04/2018 | Changes made to reflect headline restructure 30/04/2018. | Quality, Standards and Policy | |
18-1 | 23/02/2018 | 23/02/2018 | Changed name of document from HDR Code of Conduct to HDR Code of Practice to differentiate from ' Student Code of Conduct' | Graduate Research School |
17-1 | 06/11/2017 | 10/11/2017 | Amendments made in light of procedural and cultural changes, title amended to HDR Code of Conduct and changes to clause 2.2.2. | Graduate Research School |
11-1 | 05/07/2011 | 06/07/2011 | Approved by Academic Board | |
00-1 | 07-09/2000 | Approved by University Council |