Policy Authorship Procedure
Authorship Procedure
- Aboriginals and Torres Strait Islanders in Marine Science
- Courses
- Future Students
- Current Students
- Research and Teaching
- Partners and Community
- About JCU
- Reputation and Experience
- Celebrating 50 Years
- Academy
- Anthropological Laboratory for Tropical Audiovisual Research (ALTAR)
- Anton Breinl Research Centre
- Agriculture Technology and Adoption Centre (AgTAC)
- Living on Campus
- How to apply
- Advanced Analytical Centre
- Alumni
- AMHHEC
- JCU Aquaculture Solutions
- AusAsian Mental Health Research Group
- ARCSTA
- Area 61
- Association of Australian University Secretaries
- Australian Lions Stinger Research
- Australian Tropical Herbarium
- Australian Quantum & Classical Transport Physics Group
- Boating and Diving
- JCU-CSIRO Partnership
- Employability Edge
- Career Ready Plan
- Careers at JCU
- Careers and Employability
- Chancellery
- Centre for Tropical Bioinformatics and Molecular Biology
- CITBA
- CMT
- CASE
- College of Business, Law and Governance
- College of Healthcare Sciences
- College of Medicine and Dentistry
- College of Science and Engineering
- CPHMVS
- Centre for Disaster Solutions
- CSTFA
- Cyber Security Hub
- Cyclone Testing Station
- The Centre for Disaster Studies
- Daintree Rainforest Observatory
- Discover Nature at JCU
- Research Division
- Services and Resources Division
- Education Division
- Elite Athletes
- eResearch
- Environmental Research Complex [ERC]
- Estate
- Fletcherview
- Foundation for Australian Literary Studies
- Gender Equity Action and Research
- General Practice and Rural Medicine
- JC 'U' Orientation
- Give to JCU
- Governance
- Information for JCU Cairns Graduates
- Art of Academic Writing
- Art of Academic Editing
- Graduate Research School
- Graduation
- Indigenous Education and Research Centre
- Indigenous Engagement
- Indigenous Legal Needs Project
- Inherent Requirements
- IsoTropics Geochemistry Lab
- IT Services
- International Schools
- International Students
- Research and Innovation Services
- JCU Eduquarium
- JCU Events
- JCU Global Experience
- JCU Ideas Lab
- JCU Job Ready
- JCU Motorsports
- JCU Prizes
- JCU Sport
- JCU Turtle Health Research
- Language and Culture Research Centre
- CEE
- LearnJCU
- Library
- Mabo Decision: 30 years on
- MARF
- Marine Geophysics Laboratory
- New students
- Off-Campus Students
- Office of the Vice Chancellor and President
- Virtual Open Day
- Orpheus
- Outstanding Alumni
- Parents and Partners
- Pathways to university
- Planning for your future
- Placements
-
Policy
- Academic Governance
- Academic Management
- Engagement
-
Corporate Governance
- Academic Freedom and Freedom of Speech Policy
- Affiliation of a Residential College Policy
- Bullying, Discrimination, Harassment, and Sexual Misconduct Policy
- Business Continuity Policy
- Child Safety Policy
- Code of Conduct – University Council
- Compliance Policy
- Conduct of Council Elections Policy
- Conflicts of Interests Policy – University Council and its Committees
- Controlled and Non-Controlled Entities Policy
- Critical Incident Policy
- Data Governance Policy
- Distinguished Professor Policy
- Domestic and Family Violence Policy
- Emeritus Professor Policy
- Foreign Interference Policy
- General Practice Training Governance Policy
- Incident Management Policy
- Information Privacy Policy
- Legal Services Claims and Litigation Assistance Policy
- Organisational Structure Policy
- Records Management Policy
- Right to Information Policy
- Risk Management Policy
- Social Media Policy
- Staff Code of Conduct
- University Archives - Access
- University Seal Policy
- Visiting Speaker and Event Policy
- Policy Development and Review Policy
- Quality Enhancement Framework
- Reviews of Organisational Units and Thematic Areas - Policy and Procedures
-
Estate and Facility Management
- Advertising on Campus
- Alcohol Consumption on University Property
- Approval of Works to University Buildings and Site Infrastructure
- Authorised Use of University Facilities, Premises and/or Grounds for Non-core Purposes
- Environmental Policy
- High Voltage Access Policy
- Memorial Plaques
- Noise on University Sites
- Pets on Campus
- Real Estate Dealings Policy
- Security Policy
- Space Allocation and Management Policy
- Timetable and Class Registration Policy
- Tree Protection
- Vehicle Fleet Policy
- Weapons Policy
- Adaptive Workplace Policy
-
Financial Management
- Appendices
-
Assets (FMPM 200 - FMPM 399)
- FMPM 200 Overview - Assets & Cash Management
- FMPM 210 Cash
- FMPM 220 Policy - Bank Accounts
- FMPM 230 - Petty Cash Advances
- FMPM 300 Investments
- FMPM 320 Plant and Equipment
- Financial FMPM 322 - Acquisitions of Plant and Equipment
- FMPM 260 Other Advances
- FMPM 330 Non-Capital Assets
- FMPM 280 Official Stores
- FMPM 290 Prepayments
- FMPM 323 - Disposal of Property, Plant and Equipment Procedure
- FMPM 324 Stocktake
- FMPM 350 Intangible Assets
- FMPM 270-2 Accounts Receivable - Student Debtors - Penalties
- FMPM 240 Travel Advances (Students)
- FMPM 330 Non-Capital Assets
- FMPM 270-1 Accounts Receivable
- FMPM 250 - Policy Salary Advances
- Equity (FMPM 500 - FMPM 599)
- Expenses (FMPM 700 - FMPM799)
- Financial Management and Control (FMPM 800 - FMPM 899)
- Further Applications (FMPM 900 - FMPM 999)
- Introduction (FMPM 100 - FMPM 199)
- Liabilities (FMPM 400 - FMPM 499)
- Revenue (FMPM 600 - FMPM 699)
-
Human Resources
- Awards for Excellence Policy
- Bullying, Discrimination, Harassment, and Sexual Misconduct Policy
- Community and Indigenous Language Allowance
- Competency Pay for Tradespersons Policy
- Conflict of Interest Policy
- Early Retirement Policy
- Equal Employment Opportunity
- Honorary Appointments Policy
- Human Resources Policy Glossary
- Market Loading Policy
- Overpayment of Wages Policy
- Performance, Development and Recognition Policy
- Recruitment, Selection and Appointment Policy
- Relocation Assistance Policy
- Remote Working Policy
- Salary Packaging Program Policy
- Special Studies Program Policy
- Supported Wage System (SWS) Policy
- Mandatory Training Policy
- Digital Infrastructure
-
International and Admissions
- Attendance Monitoring Policy - English Language and Foundation Programs
- Enrolment Requirements for International Student Visa-Holders Policy
- Management of Off-Campus Operations, Ventures and Partnerships
- Transfer of International Student Visa Holders to Other Educational Institutions
- US Federal Student Aid-SAP & Return to Title IV Policy
- Admissions Policy
-
Learning and Teaching
- Blended Learning Policy
- Charter of Responsibilities for Academic Quality and Governance
- Coursework Academic Integrity Policy
- English Language and Numeracy Policy
- Graduate Attributes
- Graduate Certificate of Education (Academic Practice) Internal Sponsorship Policy
- Learning Teaching and Assessment Policy
- Policy Glossary
- Review of a Student’s Suitability to Continue a Course Involving Placement
- Student Digital Experience Policy
- Student Evaluation of Subjects and Teaching Policy
- Student Retention Policy
- Research Education
- Research Management
-
Student Matters
- Academic Progression Policy
- Administration of Commonwealth Scholarships Policy
- Attendance Monitoring Policy - English Language and Foundation Programs
- Award Finalisation and Graduation Policy
- Bullying, Discrimination, Harassment, and Sexual Misconduct Policy
- Copyright Policy and Procedure
- Coursework Enrolment Policy
- Coursework Scholarships, Grants and Prizes Policy
- Library Use Policy
- Student Code of Conduct
- Student Complaints Policy
- Student Disability Policy
- Student Fee Payments and Refunds Policy
- Student Review and Appeals Policy (effective from 01/01/2023)
- Student Special Circumstances Policy
- Transfer of International Student Visa Holders to Other Educational Institutions
- Student Results Policy
- Work Health and Safety
- Policy search
- PAHL
- Publications
- Professional Experience Placement
- Queensland Research Centre for Peripheral Vascular Disease
- Rapid Assessment Unit
- RDIM
- Researcher Development Portal
- Safety and Wellbeing
- Scholarships
- Contextual Science for Tropical Coastal Ecosystems
- Staff
- State of the Tropics
- Strategic Procurement
- Student Equity and Wellbeing
- Student profiles
- SWIRLnet
- TARL
- TESS
- TREAD
- TropEco for Staff and Students
- TQ Maths Hub
- TUDLab
- Unicare Centre and Unicampus Kids
- UAV
- VAVS Home
- Work Health and Safety
- WHOCC for Vector-borne & NTDs
- Media
- Copyright and Terms of Use
- Australian Institute of Tropical Health & Medicine
- Clinical Psychedelic Research Lab
Intent
Authorship must be an honest reflection of contribution to research and must be assigned fairly and consistently with established disciplinary practice and must be communicated clearly and transparently between contributors to the research.
In compliance with the principles of the JCU Code for the Responsible Conduct of Research (Research Code), this Procedure explains how to appropriately recognise and attribute the intellectual contributions of authors in research outputs. Some of the definitions and other text in this Procedure are reproduced from the National Health & Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Authorship Guide.
Scope
This procedure applies to all University research outputs, including scholarly articles, books and book chapters, conference abstracts and publications, web-based publications (including professional blogs) and any other form of authored research output that is made publicly available. This also includes authorship in other documents related to research, such as research proposals, grant applications, reports for funding bodies, tenders, patents and patent applications and any other research output where significant intellectual or scholarly contribution is required.
Definitions
Author - an individual who has made a significant intellectual contribution to a research and its output and agrees to be listed as an author
Corresponding Author - the author who is, as agreed by all co-authors, responsible for communication between publishers, managing communication between the co-authors and maintaining records of the authorship agreement
Research Output - A research output communicates or makes available the findings of research that may be in hardcopy, electronic or other form. Examples of research outputs include journal articles, book chapters, books, conference papers, reports, datasets, patents and patent applications, performances, videos and exhibitions.
Table of Contents
- Determining Who Qualifies to be An Author
- Evidence of Agreement of Authorship
- Accountabilities for the Research Output
- Acknowledgement of other contributions
- Resolution of Disputes over authorship
- Training and Education
- Potential Breaches of the Research Code
Introduction
Researchers must ensure that authors of research outputs are only those that meet the criteria of an author. It is a researcher’s responsibility to ensure that the contributions to the research output are appropriately recognised and all authors have agreed to be listed as an author, this includes contributions from student authors.
Procedure
1. Determining Who Qualifies to be An Author
Criteria for Authorship:
An author is a researcher who has made a significant intellectual or scholarly contribution to a research and its output and has agreed to be listed as an author and take responsibility for the research output.
A significant intellectual or scholarly contribution must include one, and should include a combination of two or more of the following:
- conception and design of the project or output;
- acquisition of research data where the acquisition has significant intellectual judgement, planning, design or input;
- contribution of knowledge, where justified, including Indigenous knowledge;
- analysis or interpretation of research data;
- drafting significant parts of the research output or critically revising it so as to contribute to its interpretation.
In determining authorship, contributions of knowledge must be original contributions. Previously published contributions of knowledge must be fully cited in the research output but the author of this published contribution may not meet the definition of authorship for the relevant new publication. Sometimes the editor of a significant collective work or anthology of research papers has made contributions analogous to those of an author and, in such cases similar criteria may apply to “editor” as it does to “author. The term “editor” should only be applied to a person who has played a significant role in the intellectual shaping of a publication.
Therefore, authorship can only be attributed if a researcher has made a substantial intellectual contribution as defined above to a research output.
Criteria that does not meet Authorship:
Authorship must not be attributed to a researcher or other person that has not made a significant intellectual or scholarly contribution as described above. It must not be attributed on the basis of:
- The provisions of funding, data, materials, infrastructure or access to equipment; or
- The provision of routine technical support, technical advice or technical assistance; or
- The position or profession of an individual, such as their role as the author’s supervisor or head of unit or College (“gift authorship”); or
- Whether the contribution was paid or voluntary; or
- The status of an individual who has not made a substantial intellectual contribution being such that it would elevate the esteem of the research (“guest authorship”).
2. Evidence of Agreement of Authorship
Authors on a research output must be aware of the requirements and responsibilities of authorship before any agreement on authorship is put in place. Discussions about the authorship of a research output must begin early in any collaboration and should cover:
- Any discipline specific expectations;
- Expectations of the individual authors;
- Expectations of the collaboration;
- Expected outcomes of the research; and
- Role of each author and how this will be reflected in the research output, e.g. who will be the senior author, corresponding author, the order of the authors.
These discussions should be revisited as the research project evolves or if the collaboration changes, i.e. change in focus of the expected research outcomes, collaborators join who will make a significant intellectual or scholarly contribution, or collaborators leave the project.
Record of Agreement
The researcher and their work unit must retain evidence in a secure form of the discussions and agreement of authorship as below:
Step | Description | Retention |
1 | Evidence of discussions (e.g. emails) of authorship considerations from all authors. | Retained by the corresponding author and a copy provided to each author. Copy provided to work unit. |
2 | Written evidence of agreement of authorship from all authors. Written evidence can be obtained by email or by completion and signing of the Authorship Agreement Form. The Agreement of Authorship must include descriptions of:
Note: these arrangements must be in place prior to any peer review for a refereed publication or for public release of the research output. An author must not be included on a research output without their agreement. | Retained by corresponding author and a copy provided to each author. Copy provided to JCU work unit. |
3 | Written evidence of final approval of submission of the research output for publication or release from each author. | Retained by corresponding author and a copy provided to each author. Copy provided to JCU work unit. |
4 | The written agreement should be retained permanently. | Corresponding author and work unit to organise retention, e.g. JCU Corporate Information. |
3. Accountabilities for the Research Output
Accuracy and Integrity
All authors listed on a research output have accountability for the whole research output, however, the responsibilities associated with this accountability are dependent upon the extent and type of contribution made. Each author is directly responsible for the accuracy and integrity of their contribution to the output and it should be identifiable which authors are responsible for which parts of the published work. If a researcher is unwilling to take responsibility for their contribution of a research output they should not be included as an author in that output.
The authorship team must be confident in the accuracy and integrity of the contributions of each author. If there are concerns about the accuracy and integrity of the output these must be raised with the authorship team before submission or publication of the output. Authors are responsible for addressing any concerns that are raised following publication of the output, including providing evidence to demonstrate the accuracy and integrity of an author’s contribution and seeking such evidence from the other co-authors if necessary. If an author is deceased (or cannot be contacted after reasonable attempts have been made), the co-authors must still have confidence in the accuracy and integrity of that author’s contribution. This may require consideration of the underlying data and methodology of the output.
Final Approval of the Research Output for Submission.
Each author must approve the final version of the research output to be submitted for publication or public release. This approval indicates that they agree to be accountable for the publication. The corresponding author must keep a written record that approval has been obtained from each author as per Section 2 above. If an author is deceased or after all reasonable efforts have failed to contact an author for approval to publish; submission can proceed provided there are no grounds to believe that the author would have objected to being included as an author on the publication.
4. Acknowledgement of other contributions
Researchers must ensure that all those who have contributed to the research are appropriately acknowledged. These acknowledged contributions to the research output do not meet authorship criteria, such as the contributions of technical officers, laboratory assistants, supervisors and participants. Funding bodies and organisations providing research infrastructure and facilities must also be acknowledged.
5. Resolution of Disputes over authorship
In the first instance, disputes over authorship involving a JCU researcher/s must be mediated by the relevant Associate Dean/s of Research or head of work unit. If the dispute is unable to be resolved satisfactorily, the matter may be escalated to the Deputy Vice-Chancellor of the relevant Division for review. Any review should consider:
- if there is a power imbalance between the researchers, for example, a dispute between student and supervisor;
- if researcher/s are unwilling to accept authorship and/or accountability for their contribution, obstruct progress of a research project or output or fail to cooperate with co-authors;
- if researcher/s are from multiple institutions.
If the dispute involves allegations of a potential breach of the Research Code refer to Section 7 of this Procedure for advice.
6. Training and Education
Researchers have an obligation to engage in the training and education provided by JCU in regard to their responsibilities under the Research Code, including authorship.
7. Potential Breaches of the Research Code
Any concerns or complaints about potential breaches of the Research Code, including any allegation regarding authorship, must be managed in accordance with the JCU Procedure for Managing and Investigating Potential Breaches of the Research Code. Examples of breaches of the Code that are related to authorship include, but are not limited to:
- Accepting credit or authorship on a research output where the researcher does not meet the criteria for authorship;
- Failing to attribute authorship where a researcher meets the criteria for authorship;
- Attributing authorship to a researcher without their consent;
- Publishing a research output without the final approval of the attributed authors;
- Failing to comply with an authorship agreement;
- Making a false claim about authorship in a grant application.
Related policy instruments
JCU Code for the Responsible Conduct of Research (Research Code)
Managing and Investigating Potential Breaches of the Research Code Procedure
Other related documents
Administration
NOTE: Printed copies of this procedure are uncontrolled, and currency can only be assured at the time of printing.
Approval Details
Policy Domain | Research Management |
Policy Sponsor | Deputy Vice Chancellor, Research |
Approval Authority | Deputy Vice Chancellor, Research |
Date for next Major Review | 18/11/2024 |
Revision History
Version | Approval date | Implementation date | Details | Author |
19-1 | 15/11/2019 | 18/11/2019 | Procedure established to implement the JCU Code for the Responsible Conduct of Research. | Manager, Research Grants, Ethics and Integrity |
Contact person: | Manager, Research Grants, Ethics and Integrity |
Keywords: | Authorship, research, research output, responsible research, research integrity |