AI For Students
Generative AI can be a powerful study partner when it’s used ethically, transparently, and with purpose. At JCU, your use of AI must uphold Academic Integrity and follow your Subject Outline and coordinator’s instructions. If you’re unsure whether AI is allowed for an assessment, ask your lecturer before you start.
Before you use AI: Know the rules
- Check your Subject Outline for what’s permitted (and what’s not) in each task. When in doubt, confirm with your Lecturer or Subject Coordinator.
- Academic Integrity applies to AI, submitting work generated by AI as if it were your own is academic misconduct.
- Always fact-check AI outputs and do not rely on invented citations or examples. Use the Learning Centre’s credibility checklist to verify sources.
Good ways to use AI (when allowed)
You are responsible for the accuracy and originality of your submission — human judgment comes first.
Understand content
Ask for plain-language explanations, worked examples, or step-by-step breakdowns.Plan study
Create revision schedules, practice questions from your own notes, or topic maps.Improve writing
Check clarity, grammar, and structure — then revise everything in your own words.Idea generation
Brainstorm angles or outlines that you will develop and reference yourself.
Uses of AI that are not OK
Unless your Subject Outline explicitly allows it, you must not:
Submit AI-written work
Presenting AI-generated answers, essays, or reports as your own is academic misconduct.Use AI in restricted assessments
Do not use AI in invigilated exams or other restricted assessments unless explicitly allowed.Fabricate references or data
Inserting invented citations, statistics, or experimental results is never acceptable.
Declaring your AI use (when permitted)
If you are allowed to use AI, disclose how you used it. Add a short statement (e.g., on a cover page or the first slide as provided by your respective colleges) that identifies the tool, purpose, and prompts used. You are also required to complete the AI declaration before the submission of any assignment.
Example declaration
I used Microsoft Copilot to brainstorm possible headings and to proofread grammar. I wrote all content myself and verified facts using the readings listed in my reference list. No AI-generated text has been submitted as final work without revision. Prompts used included: “Suggest 5 headings for a literature review on coastal erosion.”
Referencing AI
If your discipline requires you to cite AI outputs, follow the Library’s guidance for your style (APA, MLA, etc.). Some outputs may be classed as non-retrievable; in other cases you may need to quote and reference the tool. Check the JCU Library FAQ for current advice by style.
Check the quality of AI outputs
Before using AI-generated content:
Find authoritative sources that support the claims.
Evaluate authority, evidence, and currency.
Cross-check the details in Library databases and reliable sources.
Watch for bias and gaps in coverage. Use the Learning Centre's Checking GenAI output for credibility guide as your checklist.
Research assistance at JCU
Graduate Research School Gen AI guidelines for all Higher Degree Research Students
Academic assistance at JCU
The Learning Centre: Academic skills, writing, and integrity support (workshops, guides, consultations).
Tip for students
Protect your privacy: do not share your personal details, student number, or assignment files directly with AI tools. Treat them as public platforms unless your lecturer provides a university-approved AI system.
Choose Your Path: If You Prefer Not to Use AI
Some students may opt out of AI tools due to environmental or equity concerns. JCU supports principled choices while maintaining academic standards. If your subject includes AI-integrated assessments, you can request a non-AI pathway.
Why students opt out
Environmental impact
Large AI models require energy-intensive computing and data-centre cooling (electricity and water), plus embodied carbon in hardware. Frequent AI use at scale increases emissions compared to low-tech study workflows.Equity/access
Not all students have reliable devices, bandwidth, or paid tool access; some have privacy, cultural, disability, or neurodiversity reasons to avoid certain AI tools.
What to do (students)
- Check your Subject Outline for AI requirements and allowed tools.
- Contact your Subject Coordinator early (ideally Week 1–2) to request a non-AI option.
- Propose an equivalent approach (e.g., manual literature synthesis, human-only drafting, peer review instead of AI critique).
- Agree a plan in writing that confirms tasks, due dates, and marking.
- Keep evidence (emails, agreed rubric) in case you need to reference it later.
Email template: Request for non-AI assessment pathway
Subject: Request for non-AI assessment pathway (Subject Code)
Hi [Coordinator Name], due to [environmental/equity] concerns, I’m requesting a non-AI option for [Assessment X]. I can complete the learning outcomes by [your alternative]. Could we confirm an equivalent pathway, timeline, and rubric?
Thank you, [Your Name], [Student ID].
What will happen (staff process)
If you request a non-AI assessment pathway, staff will ensure:
Equivalence, not exemption
You’ll complete tasks that meet the same learning outcomes without AI.Comparable workload
Similar scope, time, and rigour to the AI version.Aligned marking
Same criteria (e.g., critical analysis, accuracy, ethics), with references to your chosen workflow.Privacy and access respected
No penalties for opting out when agreed in advance.
Examples of equivalent non-AI options
These are possible alternatives your lecturer may approve:
Human-only drafting
Draft all writing yourself and include an annotated method log instead of AI-assisted drafting.Manual idea generation
Generate ideas yourself and use peer feedback instead of AI brainstorming.Hand-built citations
Create your own citations and summaries instead of relying on AI-generated literature digests.Spreadsheet-based analysis
Use spreadsheets to build charts and run analysis instead of AI-driven analytics.
Need help deciding?
- Contact your Subject Coordinator
- Book the Learning Centre
- Accessibility and adjustments via AccessAbility Services