Policy Corporate Governance Reviews of Organisational Units and Thematic Areas - Policy and Procedures
Reviews of Organisational Units and Thematic Areas - Policy and Procedures
- Aboriginals and Torres Strait Islanders in Marine Science
- Courses
- Future Students
- Current Students
- Research and Teaching
- Partners and Community
- About JCU
- Reputation and Experience
- Celebrating 50 Years
- Academy
- Anthropological Laboratory for Tropical Audiovisual Research (ALTAR)
- Anton Breinl Research Centre
- Agriculture Technology and Adoption Centre
- Living on Campus
- Advanced Analytical Centre
- Applying to JCU
- Alumni
- AMHHEC
- JCU Aquaculture Solutions
- AusAsian Mental Health Research Group
- ARCSTA
- Area 61
- Association of Australian University Secretaries
- Australian/NZ Students
- Australian Lions Stinger Research
- Australian Tropical Herbarium
- Australian Quantum & Classical Transport Physics Group
- Boating and Diving
- JCU-CSIRO Partnership
- Employability Edge
- Career Ready Plan
- CASE
- Careers at JCU
- Careers and Employability
- Chancellery
- Centre for Tropical Bioinformatics and Molecular Biology
- CITBA
- CMT
- College of Business, Law and Governance
- College of Healthcare Sciences
- WHOCC for N&M Education and Research
- College of Medicine and Dentistry
- College of Science and Engineering
- CPHMVS
- Centre for Disaster Solutions
- CSTFA
- Cyber Security Hub
- Cyclone Testing Station
- The Centre for Disaster Studies
- Daintree Rainforest Observatory
- Discover Nature at JCU
- Research Division
- Services and Resources Division
- Education Division
- Economic Geology Research Centre
- Elite Athletes
- eResearch
- Environmental Research Complex [ERC]
- Estate
- Fletcherview
- Foundation for Australian Literary Studies
- Gender Equity Action and Research
- General Practice and Rural Medicine
- GetReady4Uni
- Give to JCU
- Governance
- Information for JCU Cairns Graduates
- Art of Academic Writing
- Art of Academic Editing
- Graduate Research School
- Graduation
- Indigenous Education and Research Centre
- Indigenous Engagement
- Indigenous Legal Needs Project
- Inherent Requirements
- IsoTropics Geochemistry Lab
- IT Services
- International Schools
- International Students
- Research and Innovation Services
- JCU Eduquarium
- JCU Events
- JCU Global Experience
- JCU Ideas Lab
- JCU Job Ready
- JCU Motorsports
- JCU Prizes
- JCU Sport
- JCU Turtle Health Research
- Language and Culture Research Centre
- CEE
- LearnJCU
- Library
- Mabo Decision: 30 years on
- MARF
- Marine Geophysics Laboratory
- New students
- Off-Campus Students
- Office of the Vice Chancellor and President
- Virtual Open Day
- Orpheus
- Outstanding Alumni
- Parents and Partners
- Pathways to university
- Planning for your future
- Placements
-
Policy
- Academic Governance
- Academic Management
- Engagement
-
Corporate Governance
- Academic Freedom and Freedom of Speech Policy
- Affiliation of a Residential College Policy
- Bullying, Discrimination, Harassment, and Sexual Misconduct Policy
- Business Continuity Policy
- Child Safety Policy
- Code of Conduct – University Council
- Compliance Policy
- Conduct of Council Elections Policy
- Conflicts of Interests Policy – University Council and its Committees
- Controlled and Non-Controlled Entities Policy
- Critical Incident Policy
- Data Governance Policy
- Distinguished Professor Policy
- Domestic and Family Violence Policy
- Emeritus Professor Policy
- Foreign Interference Policy
- General Practice Training Governance Policy
- Incident Management Policy
- Information Privacy Policy
- Legal Services Claims and Litigation Assistance Policy
- Organisational Structure Policy
- Records Management Policy
- Right to Information Policy
- Risk Management Policy
- Social Media Policy
- Staff Code of Conduct
- University Archives - Access
- University Seal Policy
- Visiting Speaker and Event Policy
- Policy Development and Review Policy
- Quality Enhancement Framework
- Reviews of Organisational Units and Thematic Areas - Policy and Procedures
-
Estate and Facility Management
- Advertising on Campus
- Alcohol Consumption on University Property
- Approval of Works to University Buildings and Site Infrastructure
- Authorised Use of University Facilities, Premises and/or Grounds for Non-core Purposes
- Environmental Policy
- High Voltage Access Policy
- Memorial Plaques
- Noise on University Sites
- Pets on Campus
- Real Estate Dealings Policy
- Security Policy
- Space Allocation and Management Policy
- Timetable and Class Registration Policy
- Tree Protection
- Vehicle Fleet Policy
- Weapons Policy
- Adaptive Workplace Policy
-
Financial Management
- Appendices
-
Assets (FMPM 200 - FMPM 399)
- FMPM 200 Overview - Assets & Cash Management
- FMPM 210 Cash
- FMPM 220 Policy - Bank Accounts
- FMPM 230 - Petty Cash Advances
- FMPM 300 Investments
- FMPM 320 Plant and Equipment
- Financial FMPM 322 - Acquisitions of Plant and Equipment
- FMPM 260 Other Advances
- FMPM 330 Non-Capital Assets
- FMPM 280 Official Stores
- FMPM 290 Prepayments
- FMPM 323 - Disposal of Property, Plant and Equipment Procedure
- FMPM 324 Stocktake
- FMPM 350 Intangible Assets
- FMPM 270-2 Accounts Receivable - Student Debtors - Penalties
- FMPM 240 Travel Advances (Students)
- FMPM 330 Non-Capital Assets
- FMPM 270-1 Accounts Receivable
- FMPM 250 - Policy Salary Advances
- Equity (FMPM 500 - FMPM 599)
- Expenses (FMPM 700 - FMPM799)
- Financial Management and Control (FMPM 800 - FMPM 899)
- Further Applications (FMPM 900 - FMPM 999)
- Introduction (FMPM 100 - FMPM 199)
- Liabilities (FMPM 400 - FMPM 499)
- Revenue (FMPM 600 - FMPM 699)
-
Human Resources
- Awards for Excellence Policy
- Bullying, Discrimination, Harassment, and Sexual Misconduct Policy
- Community and Indigenous Language Allowance
- Competency Pay for Tradespersons Policy
- Conflict of Interest Policy
- Early Retirement Policy
- Equal Employment Opportunity
- Honorary Appointments Policy
- Human Resources Policy Glossary
- Market Loading Policy
- Overpayment of Wages Policy
- Performance, Development and Recognition Policy
- Recruitment, Selection and Appointment Policy
- Relocation Assistance Policy
- Remote Working Policy
- Salary Packaging Program Policy
- Special Studies Program Policy
- Supported Wage System (SWS) Policy
- Digital Infrastructure
-
International and Admissions
- Attendance Monitoring Policy - English Language and Foundation Programs
- Enrolment Requirements for International Student Visa-Holders Policy
- Management of Off-Campus Operations, Ventures and Partnerships
- Transfer of International Student Visa Holders to Other Educational Institutions
- US Federal Student Aid-SAP & Return to Title IV Policy
- Admissions Policy
-
Learning and Teaching
- Blended Learning Policy
- Charter of Responsibilities for Academic Quality and Governance
- Coursework Academic Integrity Policy
- English Language and Numeracy Policy
- Graduate Attributes
- Graduate Certificate of Education (Academic Practice) Internal Sponsorship Policy
- Learning Teaching and Assessment Policy
- Policy Glossary
- Review of a Student’s Suitability to Continue a Course Involving Placement
- Student Digital Experience Policy
- Student Evaluation of Subjects and Teaching Policy
- Student Retention Policy
- Research Education
- Research Management
-
Student Matters
- Academic Progression Policy
- Administration of Commonwealth Scholarships Policy
- Attendance Monitoring Policy - English Language and Foundation Programs
- Award Finalisation and Graduation Policy
- Bullying, Discrimination, Harassment, and Sexual Misconduct Policy
- Copyright Policy and Procedure
- Coursework Enrolment Policy
- Coursework Scholarships, Grants and Prizes Policy
- Library Use Policy
- Student Code of Conduct
- Student Complaints Policy
- Student Disability Policy
- Student Fee Payments and Refunds Policy
- Student Review and Appeals Policy (effective from 01/01/2023)
- Student Special Circumstances Policy
- Transfer of International Student Visa Holders to Other Educational Institutions
- Student Results Policy
- Work Health and Safety
- Policy search
- PAHL
- Publications
- Professional Experience Placement
- Queensland Research Centre for Peripheral Vascular Disease
- Rapid Assessment Unit
- RDIM
- Researcher Development Portal
- Safety and Wellbeing
- Scholarships
- Contextual Science for Tropical Coastal Ecosystems
- Staff
- State of the Tropics
- Strategic Procurement
- Student Equity and Wellbeing
- Student profiles
- SWIRLnet
- TARL
- TESS
- TREAD
- TropEco for Staff and Students
- TQ Maths Hub
- TUDLab
- Unicare Centre and Unicampus Kids
- UAV
- VAVS Home
- Work Health and Safety
- WHOCC for Vector-borne & NTDs
- Media
- Copyright and Terms of Use
- Australian Institute of Tropical Health & Medicine
- Clinical Psychedelic Research Lab
Intent
To specify the University’s purpose and requirements for the conduct of Organisational Unit and thematic reviews.
Scope
This policy applies to all staff with direct responsibilities for the conduct of an Organisational Unit or thematic review.
Definitions
Organisational Unit – a Division or other functional area as identified for review purposes, for example, the Centre for Education and Enhancement.
Organisational Unit Head – the Divisional Deputy Vice Chancellor or designated senior management position for the Unit under review.
Policy and Procedures
1. Purpose
JCU conducts Organisational Unit and thematic reviews as part of its commitment to the philosophy of quality enhancement that moves beyond compliance and attaining standards (assurance) to participative and critical self-evaluation and improvement. The conduct of these reviews incorporates the eight principles that underpin JCU’s Quality Enhancement Framework:
- Aligning our activities with the University Intent, purpose and values;
- Encompassing the four dimensional cycle of ‘approach, deployment, results and improvement’ (ADRI);
- Encouraging a culture of self-reflection and peer review so that strengths and weaknesses may be identified and addressed;
- Collaborating with our colleagues across boundaries;
- Embracing a student focussed approach where student participation and feedback informs all phases of the quality cycle;
- Actively engaging with the community to meet its needs;
- Using evidence based practice, informed by scholarly review, and utilising quantitative and qualitative data for effective decision making and strategy evaluation; and
- Identifying and using relevant internal and external benchmarks and good practice to set goals and strive for improvement.
The reviews are designed to provide opportunities to Organisational Units and the University that include:
- Building a culture of critical self-reflection and continuous improvement;
- Self-identification and peer affirmation of strategies that have or will improve performance;
- Peer affirmation that there are structures and processes in place that facilitate a cycle of continuous improvement towards intended outcomes;
- Verification that there is measurement of outcomes and follow up of strategies and of recommendations arising from previous reviews, ensuring ‘closing of the loop’;
- Consideration of the nature and effectiveness of benchmarking activities;
- Assessment of the Organisational Unit’s engagement with its stakeholder community; and
- Identification and University acknowledgement of good practice.
Thematic reviews are undertaken to consider University priority issues and processes that span some or all JCU Organisational Units. Examples of thematic areas could include student support, flexible delivery, research-teaching nexus, etc.
2. Schedule of Reviews
Every Organisational Unit will be reviewed once every four to five years. Thematic reviews will be conducted on an as-needed basis according to University priorities and workload capacity across the institution.
The Quality, Planning and Analytics Directorate is responsible for the production of the four to five year schedule of Organisational Unit and thematic reviews. The schedule is reviewed and confirmed annually by the Vice Chancellor.
3. Organisational and Budget Responsibilities
Overall responsibility for the review process rests with the Deputy Vice Chancellor, Services and Resources.
The Quality, Planning and Analytics Directorate is responsible for the overall coordination of review processes and does this in consultation with the area under review.
Organisational Unit Heads are responsible for the timely: nomination of a review coordinator who can act as the primary liaison point with the Quality, Planning and Analytics Directorate in the conduct of the review; nomination of suitable review timing, Review Panel members and review participants; preparation of a reflective self-assessment portfolio; and response to Review Panel requests for further information.
Certain other responsibilities are set out under relevant sections below.
The costs of the Review Panel (travel, accommodation, catering, etc) are negotiated between the Organisational Unit under review and the Quality, Planning and Analytics Directorate. Organisational Units are responsible for any costs associated with the preparation of their portfolio and review participation.
4. Review Elements
The key elements of Organisational Unit and thematic reviews are:
- Agreed Terms of Reference;
- Reflective analysis portfolio;
- Independent Review Panel;
- Written submissions;
- Review visit and active engagement with stakeholders;
- Review report; and
- Follow-up action and accountability.
4.1 Terms of Reference
Terms of Reference for each review are agreed with the Organisational Unit/key parties involved and approved by the Vice Chancellor. The terms of reference guide the development of the portfolio, the conduct of the review visit and the preparation of the review report.
The Terms of Reference will vary as appropriate for each review but may include some or all of the following as key areas of strategic importance for the University:
- Leadership and planning;
- Teaching and learning;
- Research and research training;
- Contribution to the ‘Student Experience’;
- People and culture; and
- Collaboration and engagement.
Each Term of Reference will require an appraisal of current performance in supporting the University’s objectives and future opportunities and strategies for improvement. All relevant campuses/entities are encompassed in this appraisal.
The Vice Chancellor will set the Terms of Reference according to internal or external circumstances specific to the area under review.
4.2 Reflective Analysis Portfolio
For Organisational Unit reviews, the submission of the reflective analysis portfolio is the responsibility of the Unit Head, with preparation completed in consultation with relevant staff.
The portfolio should be submitted to the Quality, Planning and Analytics Directorate approximately two months prior to the review visit so that the Quality, Planning and Analytics Directorate can provide advice on any editing or supplementary information required prior to forwarding to the Review Panel.
The format for the portfolio should include:
- an overview of the Organisational Unit;
- current and future performance of the Unit within the terms of reference; and
- relevant appendices and supporting material.
The portfolio should address each Term of Reference in the context of:
- The Organisational Unit’s approach to aligning with and supporting the University goals;
- The Organisational Unit’s current performance and future aspirations and strategies to achieve these goals;
- Measures of the Organisational Unit’s success and mechanisms for monitoring, reviewing and improving its performance; and
- An assessment of strengths and areas for further improvement and proposed strategies to achieve this.
The portfolio structure should thus demonstrate use of the University’s Quality Enhancement Framework principles (including stakeholder feedback and other quantitative and qualitative data, benchmarking and collaboration) to further enhance the delivery of its services.
Preparation of the portfolio should be a consultative and collaborative process within and beyond the Organisational Unit, providing the opportunity to consider issues that might otherwise be overlooked within the daily routine.
The portfolio should be kept as concise as possible to maximise its value to the Review Panel, with appendices and supporting material minimised.
The Review Panel may also request additional evidence and documentation, either prior to or during the review visit, to assist in making judgements on performance and direction.
4.3 Independent Review Panel
An Organisational Unit Review Panel consists of approximately five members appointed by the Vice Chancellor as follows:
- A member of the University Council as Chair;
- At least two members external to the University who are distinguished in a relevant academic or professional field, with at least one ideally having international standing in that field;
- A member of the Vice Chancellor’s Advisory Committee; and
- An authorised officer of Quality, Planning and Analytics.
Thematic Review Panel membership will be determined in consultation with key stakeholders according to the area under review and will include one or more members external to the University who are distinguished in a relevant field.
The following characteristics are taken into account to ensure an appropriate balance of membership on each Review Panel:
- Considered to have impartiality/objectivity;
- Considered as an expert in at least one of the areas concerned and where possible expertise which spans a range of the Organisational Unit’s responsibilities;
- Regarded as a leader; and
- The ability to comment on good and best practice from a national and/or international perspective.
The Organisational Unit Head has the opportunity to recommend Review Panel members considered to have particular expertise of relevance for the review. Final approval of all Review Panellists is by the Vice Chancellor.
The Review Panel has designated responsibility for providing:
- an objective assessment of the Organisational Unit’s current performance; and
- commendations, affirmations and recommendations that support and enhance the Unit’s future plans.
The Review Panel achieves this by considering the Unit’s portfolio and other supporting documentation and validating and expanding on this information through the review visit meetings.
4.4 Written Submissions
The Quality, Planning and Analytics Directorate issues invitations to all students and staff, including the Vice Chancellor’s Advisory Committee, and external stakeholders as practicable, to provide written submissions to inform the Review Panel’s consideration of the terms of reference. Copies of written submissions are provided to the Review Panel and to the Head of the Organisational Unit for response as appropriate.
4.5 Review Visit
The Review Panel conducts a review visit of approximately three to four days, depending on the size and complexity of the area under review. The visit comprises a series of meetings with senior managers and staff, both internal and external to the area under review, and with students and key external stakeholders as relevant. The Review Panel will typically visit both the Townsville and Cairns campus as warranted by the area under review.
The Quality, Planning and Analytics Directorate consults with the Organisational Unit Head and the Vice Chancellor to set the dates for the review visit. The Organisational Unit Head is responsible for ensuring key Unit staff will be available for the review visit.
The Quality, Planning and Analytics Directorate prepares a draft program for the review visit in consultation with the Organisational Unit and the Review Panel. The final program is set by the Review Panel Chair.
The Organisational Unit is responsible for nominating review participants including Unit staff, other University staff with links to the Unit’s work, key external stakeholders and students. The Review Panel will decide the actual parties it wishes to consult. The Quality, Planning and Analytics Directorate will issue invitations to all proposed participants and will liaise directly with them to support their attendance.
The first day of the review visit will typically include initial meetings with the Vice Chancellor, Unit Head and senior Unit staff. The final day of the review will focus on resolving the Review Panel’s main findings. The Review Panel will conclude the visit with meetings to summarise these findings with the Vice Chancellor and then the Head (and other senior staff if desired) of the Organisational Unit.
4.6 Review report
The Quality, Planning and Analytics Directorate is responsible for drafting the review report from the agreed conclusions of the Review Panel.
The review report discusses the success of the Organisational Unit according to the review terms of reference. The Review Panel’s key findings are presented as commendations for achievements and good practices and affirmations and recommendations for further action.
The draft report is circulated to all members of the Review Panel for comment and agreement.
The agreed report is then forwarded to the Head of the Organisational Unit as a penultimate draft for comment on factual accuracy.
The final version as approved by the Panel Chair is forwarded to the Vice Chancellor and the Organisational Unit Head.
Where possible, the report of the review is finalised within eight weeks of the review. It is recognised there may be extenuating circumstances where this process may take longer. The Quality, Planning and Analytics Directorate will communicate any delays to the Organisational Unit and the Vice Chancellor.
4.7 Follow-up action and accountability
Within two months of receipt of the final review report, the Organisational Unit’s response and action plan is submitted along with the report for consideration by the Vice Chancellor’s Advisory Committee. In the case of reviews concerning Faculties or academic issues, the response, action plan and report will also be submitted for consideration by Academic Board via Education Committee.
A progress report on the action plan is required thereafter on an annual basis until all actions are completed or integrated into the planning cycle. Progress reports are submitted to the Vice Chancellor’s Advisory Committee and to Academic Board as appropriate. Actions should be integrated into the Organisational Unit plan and, where appropriate, the University plan and/or other Organisational Unit plan(s).
5. Indicative Timetable for Organisational Unit Review
Process | Timeline |
Terms of Reference, Review Panel composition and review process discussed and agreed by Quality, Planning and Analytics Directorate, Organisational Unit Head and Vice Chancellor Director of Quality, Planning and Analytics briefs staff on review process including Terms of Reference and Review Panel composition Organisational Unit commences self-assessment and planning processes in order to start preparing portfolio | Six months prior to review visit |
Director of Quality, Planning and Analytics invites submissions from students, staff and external parties | Two months prior to review visit |
Organisational Unit Head submits portfolio to Quality, Planning and Analytics Directorate Written submissions due to Quality, Planning and Analytics Directorate | Six weeks prior to review visit |
Portfolio and written submissions sent to Review Panel members | Five weeks prior to review visit |
Briefing of Panel Chair | Four weeks prior to review visit |
Preliminary Review Panel meeting (video/teleconference) Review visit program confirmed Additional information requested | Three weeks prior to review visit |
Additional information provided to Review Panel | One week prior to review visit |
Review Panel conducts interviews on campus | Review visit (approx three days) |
Final draft review report to Organisational Unit Head for factual check | Within six weeks of visit |
Review Panel submits its final report to the Vice Chancellor and Organisational Unit Head | Within eight weeks of visit |
Organisational Unit submits final report, response and action plan to the Vice Chancellor’s Advisory Committee and, in the case of division/academic area reviews, Academic Board via Education Committee | Within two months of final report |
Organisational Unit Head submits an action plan progress report the Vice Chancellor’s Advisory Committee and, in the case of division/academic area reviews, Academic Board via Education Committee | Twelve months after initial action plan and annually thereafter until actions completed/integrated into Organisational Unit Plan |
Related documents, legislation or JCU Statutes
Administration
Approval Details
NOTE: Printed copies of this policy are uncontrolled, and currency can only be assured at the time of printing.
Policy Domain | Corporate Governance |
Policy Sponsor | Vice Chancellor |
Approval authority | Council |
Date for next Major Review | 28/02/2019 |
Revision History
Version no: | Approval date | Implementation date | Details: | Author |
17-1 | 19/01/2017 | 25/01/2017 | Minor amendments to align with current organisation structure and current delegation practice | Quality, Standards and Policy Officer |
15-1 | 10/09/2015 | 10/09/2015 | Policy sponsor and approval authority amended to reflect Council approved Policy and Delegations Framework | Quality, Standards and Policy |
12-1 | 28/02/2012 | 29/02/2012 |