
Policy Comprehensive Course Review Procedure
Comprehensive Course Review Procedure
- Courses
- Future Students
- Current Students
- Research and Teaching
- Partners and Community
- About JCU
- Celebrating 50 Years
- ALTAR
- Anton Breinl Research Centre
- Agriculture Technology and Adoption Centre
- Living on Campus
- Advanced Prawn Breeding Research Hub
- Advanced Analytical Centre
- Applying to JCU
- Alumni
- AMHHEC
- AusAsian Mental Health Research Group
- ARCSTA
- Area 61
- Australian/NZ Students
- Australian Lions Stinger Research
- Boating and Diving
- ATSIP
- Australian Tropical Herbarium
- Careers at JCU
- Association of Australian University Secretaries
- Careers and Employability
- Australian Quantum & Classical Transport Physics Group
- CITBA
- Centre for Tropical Bioinformatics and Molecular Biology
- Chancellery
- CMT
- CASE
- College of Business, Law and Governance
- College of Healthcare Sciences
- WHOCC for N&M Education and Research
- College of Medicine and Dentistry
- College of Science and Engineering
- CPHMVS
- COVID-19 Advice
- Centre for Disaster Solutions
- CSTFA
- Cyclone Testing Station
- The Centre for Disaster Studies
- Daintree Rainforest Observatory
- Diploma of Higher Education
- Discover Nature at JCU
- Research Division
- Services and Resources Division
- Education Division
- Division of Tropical Environments and Societies
- Division of Tropical Health and Medicine
- Economic Geology Research Centre
- eResearch
- ERC
- Estate
- Financial and Business Services Office
- Fletcherview
- Foundation for Australian Literary Studies
- Gender Equity Action and Research
- GetReady4Uni
- Give to JCU
- Governance
- Information for JCU Cairns Graduates
- Art of Academic Writing DRAFT
- Graduate Research School
- Graduation
- Indigenous Education and Research Centre
- Indigenous Legal Needs Project
- IsoTropics Geochemistry Lab
- IT Services
- International Schools
- International Students
- JCU Connect
- JCU Contact Information
- JCU Eduquarium
- JCU Events
- JCU Global Experience
- JCU Ideas Lab
- JCU Motorsports
- JCU Prizes
- JCU Sport
- JCU Turtle Health Research
- Language and Culture Research Centre
- LTSE
- LearnJCU
- Library
- Mabo Decision: 30 years on
- MARF
- Marine Geophysics Laboratory
- New students
- Off-Campus Students
- Office of the Vice Chancellor and President
- Virtual Open Day
- Orpheus
- Outstanding Alumni Awards
- Parents and Partners
- Pathways to university
- Planning and Performance
- Planning for your future
- Placements
-
Policy
- Academic Governance
- Academic Management
- Community, Marketing and Alumni
-
Corporate Governance
- Academic Freedom and Freedom of Speech Policy
- Affiliation of a Residential College Policy
- Bullying, Discrimination, Harassment, and Sexual Misconduct Policy
- Business Continuity Policy
- Child Safety Policy
- Code of Conduct – University Council
- Compliance Policy
- Conduct of Council Elections Policy
- Conflicts of Interests Policy – University Council and its Committees
- Controlled and Non-Controlled Entities Policy
- Critical Incident Policy
- Data Governance Policy
- Distinguished Professor Policy
- Domestic and Family Violence Policy
- Emeritus Professor Policy
- Foreign Interference Policy
- General Practice Training Governance Policy
- Incident Management Policy
- Information Privacy Policy
- Legal Services Claims and Litigation Assistance Policy
- Organisational Structure Policy
- Records Management Policy
- Right to Information Policy
- Risk Management Policy
- Social Media Policy
- Staff Code of Conduct
- University Archives - Access
- University Seal Policy
- Visiting Speaker and Event Policy
-
Estate and Facility Management
- Advertising on Campus
- Alcohol Consumption on University Property
- Approval of Works to University Buildings and Site Infrastructure
- Authorised Use of University Facilities, Premises and/or Grounds for Non-core Purposes
- Environmental Policy
- High Voltage Access Policy
- Memorial Plaques
- Noise on University Sites
- Pets on Campus
- Real Estate Dealings Policy
- Security Policy
- Space Allocation and Management Policy
- Timetable and Class Registration Policy
- Tree Protection
- Vehicle Fleet Policy
- Weapons Policy
-
Financial Management
- Appendices
-
Assets (FMPM 200 - FMPM 399)
- FMPM 200 Overview - Assets & Cash Management
- FMPM 210 Cash
- FMPM 220 Policy - Bank Accounts
- FMPM 230 - Petty Cash Advances
- FMPM 300 Investments
- FMPM 320 Plant and Equipment
- Financial FMPM 322 - Acquisitions of Plant and Equipment
- FMPM 260 Other Advances
- FMPM 330 Non-Capital Assets
- FMPM 280 Official Stores
- FMPM 290 Prepayments
- FMPM 323 - Disposal of Property, Plant and Equipment Procedure
- FMPM 324 Stocktake
- FMPM 350 Intangible Assets
- FMPM 270-2 Accounts Receivable - Student Debtors - Penalties
- FMPM 240 Travel Advances (Students)
- FMPM 330 Non-Capital Assets
- FMPM 270-1 Accounts Receivable
- FMPM 250 - Policy Salary Advances
- Equity (FMPM 500 - FMPM 599)
- Expenses (FMPM 700 - FMPM799)
- Financial Management and Control (FMPM 800 - FMPM 899)
- Further Applications (FMPM 900 - FMPM 999)
- Introduction (FMPM 100 - FMPM 199)
- Liabilities (FMPM 400 - FMPM 499)
- Revenue (FMPM 600 - FMPM 699)
-
Human Resources
- Academic Promotion Policy
- Awards for Excellence Policy
- Bullying, Discrimination, Harassment, and Sexual Misconduct Policy
- Community and Indigenous Language Allowance
- Competency Pay for Tradespersons Policy
- Conflict of Interest Policy
- Early Retirement Policy
- Enterprise Agreement 2016
- Equal Employment Opportunity
- Honorary Appointments Policy
- Human Resources Policy Glossary
- Market Loading Policy
- Optional Working Hours System (Op-Time)
- Overpayment of Wages Policy
- Performance, Development and Recognition Policy
- Recruitment, Selection and Appointment Policy
- Relocation Assistance Policy
- Remote Working Policy
- Salary Packaging Program Policy
- Special Studies Program Policy
- Staff Study Assistance Policy
- Supported Wage System (SWS) Policy
- Digital Infrastructure
-
International
- Attendance Monitoring Policy - English Language and Foundation Programs
- Enrolment Requirements for International Student Visa-Holders Policy
- Management of Off-Campus Operations, Ventures and Partnerships
- Transfer of International Student Visa Holders to Other Educational Institutions
- US Federal Student Aid-SAP & Return to Title IV Policy
-
Learning and Teaching
- Blended Learning Policy
- Charter of Responsibilities for Academic Quality and Governance
- Coursework Academic Integrity Policy
- Curriculum Approval, Accreditation, Monitoring, Review and Improvement Policy
- English Language and Numeracy Policy
- Graduate Attributes
- Graduate Certificate of Education (Academic Practice) Internal Sponsorship Policy
- Learning Teaching and Assessment Policy
- Policy Glossary
- Review of a Student’s Suitability to Continue a Course Involving Placement
- Student Digital Experience Policy
- Student Evaluation of Subjects and Teaching Policy
- Student Retention Policy
- Quality and Planning
- Research Education
- Research Management
-
Student Services
- Academic Progression Policy effective 1/1/2022
- Academic Progression Policy effective to 31/12/2021
- Administration of Commonwealth Scholarships Policy
- Admissions Policy
- Attendance Monitoring Policy - English Language and Foundation Programs
- Award Finalisation and Graduation Policy
- Bullying, Discrimination, Harassment, and Sexual Misconduct Policy
- Copyright Policy and Procedure
- Coursework Enrolment Policy
- Coursework Scholarships, Bursaries, Grants and Prizes Policy
- Enrolment Requirements for International Student Visa-Holders Policy
- Intervention Strategy for Students Who Have Not Made Satisfactory Academic Progress
- Library Use Policy
- Student Code of Conduct
- Student Complaints Policy
- Student Fee Payments and Refunds Policy
- Student Results Policy effective from 1/1/2022
- Student Results Policy effective to 31/12/2021
- Student Review and Appeals Policy
- Student Disability Policy
- Transfer of International Student Visa Holders to Other Educational Institutions
- Work Health and Safety
- Policy search
- PAHL
- Publications
- Professional Experience Placement
- Queensland Research Centre for Peripheral Vascular Disease
- Rapid Assessment Unit
- RDIM
- Researcher Development Portal
- Safety and Wellbeing
- Scholarships
- Contextual Science for Tropical Coastal Ecosystems
- Staff
- State of the Tropics
- Strategic Procurement
- Student Equity and Wellbeing
- Student profiles
- SWIRLnet
- TARL
- TESS
- TREAD
- TropEco
- TQ Maths Hub
- TUDLab
- Unicare Centre and Unicampus Kids
- UAV
- VAVS Home
- Work Health and Safety
- WHOCC for Vector-borne & NTDs
- Media
- Copyright and Terms of Use
- Australian Institute of Tropical Health & Medicine
- Indigenous Engagement
Intent
This procedure provides the structure and process for the comprehensive review of all coursework delivered at JCU and are framed under the following principles:
- All JCU academic courses of study leading to an award are required to comply with TEQSA and AQF requirements.
- All JCU courses of study are required to participate in the university’s course and subject quality review cycles, including but not limited to:
- Annual course review (Course Performance Reporting); and
- Internal review every 5-7 years (Comprehensive Course Review, including those courses subject to Professional Accreditation)
- Divisions are responsible to ensure all comprehensive course review requirements (internal and external) are met. Division governance responsibility rests with the Division Board of Study.
- Comprehensive course reviews will be discipline focused across all AQF levels.
Scope
These procedures apply to all staff engaged in coursework courses leading to an award at all JCU campuses. Course approval activities are excluded from this procedure.
Definitions
Unless specified otherwise, the meaning of terms used in this procedure are defined in the Policy Glossary.
Procedure
Introduction
JCU is committed to conducting systematic reviews of course quality for all academic programs. The purpose of course reviews is to:
- Ensure the academic quality of JCU’s programs are of the highest calibre possible;
- Assure the university’s sustainability as a tertiary education provider; and
- Meet the requirements under the Higher Education Standards Framework (Threshold Standards) 2021.
All coursework courses will be reviewed as part of the University’s commitment to quality enhancement. Reviews will consist of either:
Annual Course Performance Review. The regular review of course performance which is used to inform quality improvement activities. Courses to be reviewed will be determined each year. Known as Course Performance Reporting.
Comprehensive Course Review. Cyclical comprehensive course review to review each course’s quality and improvement activities, ‘fit’ and contribution to the university. Occurs at least every 7 years.
1. Comprehensive Course Review
1.1 A comprehensive course review must be conducted on all courses of study or groups of associated courses at least once every 7 years for the purposes of renewal (i.e. internal re-accreditation).
1.2 Comprehensive Course Reviews are undertaken with reference to a set of Academic Course Review Quality Indicators. See Attachment 1.
1.3 The ‘First Pass’ Course Assessment is calculated using a sub-set of the Academic Course Review Quality Indicators. This assessment is populated on Cognos by Planning, Performance and Analytics, with review and approval by the relevant Division.
1.4 The courses and Approved Associated Courses (AAC) as determined in the most recent annual course review cycle will be used to determine which courses will be profiled and whether they will be grouped. This structure can be adjusted by Directors of Academic Quality and Strategy as required.
1.5 The resulting First Pass Assessment will inform the priority and type of course review to be undertaken by each course. The final selection of type of review activity and the timing will be determined by the Directors of Academic Quality and Strategy.
1.6 Where a course is to be discontinued a review is recommended to inform future program development. This is not mandatory.
1.7 Whilst all courses will participate in the Comprehensive Course Review process, those courses externally accredited shall be reviewed on the basis of any gaps between external accreditation requirements and the Quality Indicators.
1.8 There are three types of Comprehensive course reviews (See Table 1):
- Desktop Review (Low Risk)
- Panel Interview (Moderate Risk)
- Panel Visit (High Risk)
1.9 Courses undertaking a Comprehensive course review are not required to also undertake the annual Course Performance Reporting process that falls within a 12 month window following the Comprehensive Course Review process. However, they will be required to do a report on recommendations from the Comprehensive Course Review.
1.10 New courses (first year offered ≤ 3 years) are not required to participate in the Comprehensive Course Review process. New courses will participate in a Course Sustainability Review.
1.11 Recommendations from Comprehensive Course Reviews can lead to further/other review processes.
2. ‘First Pass’ Course Assessment
2.1 The initial ‘first pass’ is an annual activity undertaken in consultation with Divisions responsible for oversight of individual courses.
2.2 The ‘first pass’ methodology reviews Quality Indicators which have readily available data, being QI 1, 2a, 2b, 3, 4, 5a, 5b, ,6 ,7a, 7b. The First Pass Assessment provides a profile of the academic course.
2.3 First Pass Assessment results in an initial allocation of review type for each academic course, being:
Review Type | Risk Assessment | First Pass Assessment result |
Desktop Review | Low Risk |
|
Panel Interview | Moderate Risk |
|
Panel Visit | High Risk |
|
2.4 The initial Academic Course First Pass Assessment is reviewed and signed off by the respective Director of Academic Quality and Strategy. The results of this assessment will inform the priority and type of Comprehensive course review to be undertaken by each course.
2.5 The Director of Academic Quality and Strategy reserves the right to amend the result of the First Pass Assessment.
3. Review Activity Types
Table 1. Comprehensive Course Review Activity Types
Review activity | No Review | Desktop | Interview | Visit |
Methodology notes | Course to be disestablished or new course (≤ 3 years) | Standard documentation + Simple Portfolio of Evidence is provided Does not require visits or meetings | Standard documentation + Comprehensive Portfolio of Evidence is provided + 1-2 interviews | Standard documentation + Comprehensive Portfolio of Evidence + Panel visit (1-2 days) Panel will include a minimum of one external member. |
Comprehensive Course Review Application |
| Y | Y | Y |
Completed First Pass Course Review report (Signed by DAQS) |
| Y | Y | Y |
External accreditation report (most recent) |
| If applicable | If applicable | If applicable |
Portfolio of evidence (Simple or Comprehensive) | S | C | C | |
Focussed meetings (1-2 meetings with academic staff) |
| Y | Y | |
On-site visit/Zoom by Panel to cover a comprehensive range of course matters | Y |
3.1 Desktop Review
3.1.1 The Desktop Review is primarily intended for those courses that require further internal review of their academic quality. It may apply to some courses that undertake professional accreditation with external agencies.
3.1.2 A Desktop Review will require supporting evidence to address targeted/specific areas of review within the range of Quality Indicators that have been identified in the First Pass Assessment. The additional evidence required will be identified by members of the Academic Course Review Committee. The additional evidence forms the Simple Portfolio of Evidence.
3.1.3 Every review will result in a report (panel to reach consensus) to the Academic Course Review Committee who will then report to the Academic Board.
3.2 Panel Interview
3.2.1 Panel interviews will consist of the information sought in a Desktop Review plus additional information derived from 1-2 interviews with key academic staff. It does not require access to a greater range of stakeholders or resources and is intended to be administratively simpler than a full panel visit.
3.2.2 Panel interviews will be facilitated by the respective College or Division. These will be held with members of the senior academic management team for the course. Education Division provides secretariat services to the Panel.
3.2.3 Any costs associated with the review is the responsibility of the College.
3.2.4 Panel interviews will be informed with sufficient evidence (portfolio) to enable informed recommendations. Some questions from the Panel will be provided to members of the senior academic management team prior to the interview.
3.2.5 Every review will result in a report (panel to reach consensus) to the Academic Course Review Committee who will then report to the Academic Board. The report will focus on the Academic Course Review Quality Indicators (Attachment 1).
3.3 Panel Visit
3.3.1 Panel visits will consist of the information sought in a Desktop Review plus additional information derived from a range of interviews ‘on site’ or via Zoom with academic, external and student stakeholders.
3.3.2 Visits by a Panel will be organised and facilitated by the respective College or Division.
3.3.3 Any costs associated with the review will be the responsibility of the College.
3.3.4 Review visits will be informed with sufficient evidence (portfolio) to enable informed recommendations. This is a Comprehensive Portfolio of Evidence.
3.3.5 Every review will result in a report (panel to reach consensus) to the Academic Course Review Committee who will then report to the Academic Board. The report will focus on the Academic Course Review Quality Indicators (Attachment 1). Education Division provides secretariat services to the Panel.
4. Comprehensive Course Review Committee
4.1 Academic Board will convene a Committee consisting of:
- Chair Academic Board
- Deputy Vice Chancellor Students
- Executive Officer (Operations), Office of the Provost
- Directors of Academic Quality and Strategy – DTHM, DTES
- Director, Planning, Performance & Analytics
- The Secretariat will be provided by the Education Division
4.2 The Committee will meet at least annually. Its role is to:
- Develop and maintain a schedule of Comprehensive course review activities
- Oversight of the implementation of Comprehensive course reviews
- Determine the type of Comprehensive course review required for each course
- Appoint Comprehensive Course Review Panel members including the Panel Chair.
- Identify the scope including specific areas of investigation for each comprehensive course review. These are determined on analysis of the ‘First Pass’ Assessment and the course’s application for renewal.
5. Comprehensive Course Review Panel composition
5.1 According to the schedule of Comprehensive course reviews, the Chair of the Academic Board will determine appropriate academic staff to undertake desktop reviews, panel interviews or panel visits.
- Desktop Review Panels will comprise a team consisting of one academic staff member from another Academic Division, one Course Coordinator from the Academic Division but not the College and a member of the Academic Board. Academic Board member will chair Desktop Review and prepare report and recommendations.
- Panel Interviews will comprise a team consisting of one academic from the other Academic Division and one Course Coordinator from the Academic Division but not the College, and a member from the Academic Board. The Academic Board member will chair Panel Interviews and prepare report and recommendations.
- Panel Visits will comprise of one Course Coordinator from the Academic Division but not the College, the Director of Quality and Strategy from the Division, a member from the Academic Board and an external expert either from Alumni, industry or another institution (determined by College Dean and approved by Academic Course Quality Review Panel). The Academic Board member will chair Panel Visits, prepare report and recommendations
5.2 The Education Division will provide secretariat services to the Committee.
6. Comprehensive Course Review Reporting
6.1 The outcome of every Comprehensive course review will be a report to Academic Board with one clear recommendation to:
- Renew the course of study without conditions; or
- Renew the course of study with recommended (formative) improvements; or
- Renew the course of study with required (summative) improvements (including a 12 month
- and 24 month implementation plan); or
- Suspend the course for a period of time (timeframe identified); or
- Disestablish the course.
6.2 Any reports containing required (summative) conditions must include:
- Definition of the matter generating the issue;
- Specific actions to address the issue;
- Timeframe for completion; and
- Required outcome; and
- Reporting to Divisional Board of Studies Meetings.
6.3 All reports resulting from Comprehensive course reviews will be provided to the Academic Board for consideration. Academic Board will determine:
- The continuation or discontinuation of the course
- Any conditions required for continuation
- Approve the recommendation.
6.4 The decision to continue (renew) courses will be made by the appropriate delegate on recommendation of the Academic Course Review Committee.
7. Follow up reporting
7.1 All courses renewed under the Comprehensive Course Review process must:
- Meet any summative conditions of renewal as required by Academic Board; and
- Formally consider any formative improvements noted by Academic Board.
- Action Plans/Follow-up/Report back to the Divisional Executive Committee (evidence of issues addressed) and Annual Reporting to Academic Board
8. Seven Year Comprehensive Course Review Cycle
8.1 The Schedule of Comprehensive Course Review is reviewed annually by the Directors Academic Quality and Strategy and the Academic Course Review Committee.
9. Roles and Responsibilities
9.1 Comprehensive Course Review
Activity | Role |
Grouping of courses undertaken/review schedule | Director Academic Quality & Strategy |
Co-ordinate schedule of reviews | Education Division |
Develop and maintain a schedule of comprehensive review activities | Director Academic Quality & Strategy Education Division |
Approve schedule of reviews | Academic Board on recommendation of Academic Course Review Committee |
Oversight of the implementation of Comprehensive course reviews | Academic Course Review Committee |
Determine the type of Comprehensive course review required | Academic Course Review Committee |
Appoint Course Review Panel members including Panel Chair | Chair Academic Board & Academic Course Review Committee |
Identify specific areas of investigation for each course review | Academic Course Review Committee |
Custodianship of Comprehensive Course Review documentation | Education Division |
Prepare audit response report and evidence * | Academy – Course Coordinators *Where required for accreditation purposes, Academic Head has responsibility to oversee review |
Undertake Comprehensive course review | Comprehensive Course Review Panel |
Coordinate Review activities (i.e. audit, interviews, visits) | College in consultation with Education Division |
Comprehensive Course Review Report Fact Checking | Academic Course Coordinator Academic Head Director Academic Quality & Strategy |
Determine recommendation to Academic Board | Comprehensive Course Review Panel |
Sign-off on Recommendation to Academic Board to Renew/ Suspend/ Disestablish Course | Academic Course Review Committee |
Comprehensive Course Review Reporting to Academic Board | Education Division |
Review recommendations and plan actions and reporting | Course Coordinator Academic Head |
Assure quality of academic courses | Divisional Board of Studies |
Governance of institutional quality assurance | Academic Board |
Related policy instruments
Curriculum Approval, Accreditation, Monitoring, Review and Improvement Policy
Curriculum Approval, Monitoring, Review and Improvement Procedure
Other related documents
Higher Education Standards Framework (Threshold Standards) 2021
List of Attachments
Attachment 1 – Comprehensive Course Review Quality Indicators
Administration
Approval Details
Policy Domain | Academic Management |
Policy Sponsor | Provost |
Approval Authority | Provost |
Date for next review | 18/02/2025 |
Revision History
Version | Approval date | Implementation date | Details | Author |
---|---|---|---|---|
22-1 | 18/02/2022 | 22/02/2022 | Scheduled review of procedure and review of Quality Indicators for First Pass Assessment Report. Amendments to improve functionality Procedure moved from Quality and Planning policy domain to Academic Management | Quality Standards Coordinator |
19-1 | 29/03/2019 | 05/04/2019 | Scheduled review of procedure and review of Quality Indicators for First Pass Assessment Report. Minor amendments to improve functionality. | Quality, Standards and Policy Officer |
18-1 | 30/04/2018 | 31/05/2018 | Scheduled review of procedure – minor amendments to improve functionality | Quality, Standards and Policy Officer |
17-1 | 15/05/2017 | 17/05/2017 | Procedure established | Manager, Quality, Standards and Policy |
Key words: | quality, standards, performance review, TEQSA, AQF |
Contact person: | Quality Standards Coordinator |