Policy HDR Nomination of Examiners Procedure
HDR Nomination of Examiners Procedure
- Aboriginals and Torres Strait Islanders in Marine Science
- Courses
- Future Students
- Current Students
- Research and Teaching
- Partners and Community
- About JCU
- Reputation and Experience
- Celebrating 50 Years
- Academy
- ALTAR
- Anton Breinl Research Centre
- Agriculture Technology and Adoption Centre
- Living on Campus
- Advanced Prawn Breeding Research Hub
- Advanced Analytical Centre
- Applying to JCU
- Alumni
- AMHHEC
- JCU Aquaculture Solutions
- AusAsian Mental Health Research Group
- ARCSTA
- Area 61
- Association of Australian University Secretaries
- Australian/NZ Students
- Australian Lions Stinger Research
- Boating and Diving
- JCU-CSIRO Partnership
- Employability Edge
- Career Ready Plan
- Australian Tropical Herbarium
- Careers at JCU
- Careers and Employability
- Australian Quantum & Classical Transport Physics Group
- Centre for Tropical Bioinformatics and Molecular Biology
- CITBA
- Chancellery
- CMT
- CASE
- College of Business, Law and Governance
- College of Healthcare Sciences
- WHOCC for N&M Education and Research
- College of Medicine and Dentistry
- College of Science and Engineering
- CPHMVS
- COVID-19 Advice
- Centre for Disaster Solutions
- CSTFA
- Cyclone Testing Station
- The Centre for Disaster Studies
- Daintree Rainforest Observatory
- Diploma of Higher Education
- Discover Nature at JCU
- Research Division
- Services and Resources Division
- Education Division
- Division of Tropical Environments and Societies
- Division of Tropical Health and Medicine
- Economic Geology Research Centre
- Elite Athletes
- eResearch
- ERC
- Estate
- Financial and Business Services Office
- Fletcherview
- Foundation for Australian Literary Studies
- Gender Equity Action and Research
- GetReady4Uni
- Give to JCU
- Governance
- Information for JCU Cairns Graduates
- Graduate Research School
- Graduation
- Indigenous Education and Research Centre
- Indigenous Engagement
- Indigenous Legal Needs Project
- Inherent Requirements
- IsoTropics Geochemistry Lab
- IT Services
- International Schools
- International Students
- Research and Innovation Services
- JCU Eduquarium
- JCU Events
- JCU Global Experience
- JCU Ideas Lab
- JCU Job Ready
- JCU Motorsports
- JCU Prizes
- JCU Sport
- JCU Turtle Health Research
- Language and Culture Research Centre
- CEE
- LearnJCU
- Library
- Mabo Decision: 30 years on
- National Reconciliation Week
- MARF
- Marine Geophysics Laboratory
- New students
- Off-Campus Students
- Office of the Vice Chancellor and President
- Virtual Open Day
- Orpheus
- Outstanding Alumni
- Parents and Partners
- Pathways to university
- Planning for your future
- Placements
-
Policy
- Academic Governance
- Academic Management
- Engagement
-
Corporate Governance
- Academic Freedom and Freedom of Speech Policy
- Affiliation of a Residential College Policy
- Bullying, Discrimination, Harassment, and Sexual Misconduct Policy
- Business Continuity Policy
- Child Safety Policy
- Code of Conduct – University Council
- Compliance Policy
- Conduct of Council Elections Policy
- Conflicts of Interests Policy – University Council and its Committees
- Controlled and Non-Controlled Entities Policy
- Critical Incident Policy
- Data Governance Policy
- Distinguished Professor Policy
- Domestic and Family Violence Policy
- Emeritus Professor Policy
- Foreign Interference Policy
- General Practice Training Governance Policy
- Incident Management Policy
- Information Privacy Policy
- Legal Services Claims and Litigation Assistance Policy
- Organisational Structure Policy
- Records Management Policy
- Right to Information Policy
- Risk Management Policy
- Social Media Policy
- Staff Code of Conduct
- University Archives - Access
- University Seal Policy
- Visiting Speaker and Event Policy
- Policy Development and Review Policy
- Quality Enhancement Framework
- Reviews of Organisational Units and Thematic Areas - Policy and Procedures
-
Estate and Facility Management
- Advertising on Campus
- Alcohol Consumption on University Property
- Approval of Works to University Buildings and Site Infrastructure
- Authorised Use of University Facilities, Premises and/or Grounds for Non-core Purposes
- Environmental Policy
- High Voltage Access Policy
- Memorial Plaques
- Noise on University Sites
- Pets on Campus
- Real Estate Dealings Policy
- Security Policy
- Space Allocation and Management Policy
- Timetable and Class Registration Policy
- Tree Protection
- Vehicle Fleet Policy
- Weapons Policy
- Adaptive Workplace Policy
-
Financial Management
- Appendices
-
Assets (FMPM 200 - FMPM 399)
- FMPM 200 Overview - Assets & Cash Management
- FMPM 210 Cash
- FMPM 220 Policy - Bank Accounts
- FMPM 230 - Petty Cash Advances
- FMPM 300 Investments
- FMPM 320 Plant and Equipment
- Financial FMPM 322 - Acquisitions of Plant and Equipment
- FMPM 260 Other Advances
- FMPM 330 Non-Capital Assets
- FMPM 280 Official Stores
- FMPM 290 Prepayments
- FMPM 323 - Disposal of Property, Plant and Equipment Procedure
- FMPM 324 Stocktake
- FMPM 350 Intangible Assets
- FMPM 270-2 Accounts Receivable - Student Debtors - Penalties
- FMPM 240 Travel Advances (Students)
- FMPM 330 Non-Capital Assets
- FMPM 270-1 Accounts Receivable
- FMPM 250 - Policy Salary Advances
- Equity (FMPM 500 - FMPM 599)
- Expenses (FMPM 700 - FMPM799)
- Financial Management and Control (FMPM 800 - FMPM 899)
- Further Applications (FMPM 900 - FMPM 999)
- Introduction (FMPM 100 - FMPM 199)
- Liabilities (FMPM 400 - FMPM 499)
- Revenue (FMPM 600 - FMPM 699)
-
Human Resources
- Awards for Excellence Policy
- Bullying, Discrimination, Harassment, and Sexual Misconduct Policy
- Community and Indigenous Language Allowance
- Competency Pay for Tradespersons Policy
- Conflict of Interest Policy
- Early Retirement Policy
- Enterprise Agreement 2016
- Equal Employment Opportunity
- Honorary Appointments Policy
- Human Resources Policy Glossary
- Market Loading Policy
- Overpayment of Wages Policy
- Performance, Development and Recognition Policy
- Recruitment, Selection and Appointment Policy
- Relocation Assistance Policy
- Remote Working Policy
- Salary Packaging Program Policy
- Special Studies Program Policy
- Supported Wage System (SWS) Policy
- Digital Infrastructure
-
International and Admissions
- Attendance Monitoring Policy - English Language and Foundation Programs
- Enrolment Requirements for International Student Visa-Holders Policy
- Management of Off-Campus Operations, Ventures and Partnerships
- Transfer of International Student Visa Holders to Other Educational Institutions
- US Federal Student Aid-SAP & Return to Title IV Policy
- Admissions Policy
-
Learning and Teaching
- Blended Learning Policy
- Charter of Responsibilities for Academic Quality and Governance
- Coursework Academic Integrity Policy
- English Language and Numeracy Policy
- Graduate Attributes
- Graduate Certificate of Education (Academic Practice) Internal Sponsorship Policy
- Learning Teaching and Assessment Policy
- Policy Glossary
- Review of a Student’s Suitability to Continue a Course Involving Placement
- Student Digital Experience Policy
- Student Evaluation of Subjects and Teaching Policy
- Student Retention Policy
- Research Education
- Research Management
-
Student Matters
- Academic Progression Policy
- Administration of Commonwealth Scholarships Policy
- Attendance Monitoring Policy - English Language and Foundation Programs
- Award Finalisation and Graduation Policy
- Bullying, Discrimination, Harassment, and Sexual Misconduct Policy
- Copyright Policy and Procedure
- Coursework Enrolment Policy
- Coursework Scholarships, Grants and Prizes Policy
- Library Use Policy
- Student Code of Conduct
- Student Complaints Policy
- Student Disability Policy
- Student Fee Payments and Refunds Policy
- Student Results Policy
- Student Review and Appeals Policy (effective from 01/01/2023)
- Student Special Circumstances Policy
- Transfer of International Student Visa Holders to Other Educational Institutions
- Work Health and Safety
- Policy search
- PAHL
- Publications
- Professional Experience Placement
- Queensland Research Centre for Peripheral Vascular Disease
- Rapid Assessment Unit
- RDIM
- Researcher Development Portal
- Safety and Wellbeing
- Scholarships
- Contextual Science for Tropical Coastal Ecosystems
- Staff
- State of the Tropics
- Strategic Procurement
- Student Equity and Wellbeing
- Student profiles
- SWIRLnet
- TARL
- TESS
- TREAD
- TropEco
- TQ Maths Hub
- TUDLab
- Unicare Centre and Unicampus Kids
- UAV
- VAVS Home
- Work Health and Safety
- WHOCC for Vector-borne & NTDs
- Media
- Copyright and Terms of Use
- Australian Institute of Tropical Health & Medicine
Intent & Scope
To outline the process to be followed in nominating examiners of theses and other examinable outputs of the research produced by a candidate for a Higher Degree by Research (HDR), PhD by Prior Publication or a Higher Doctorate.
Definitions
Terms mentioned in this document and not defined here are defined in the Policy Glossary in the Learning and Teaching domain of the University Policy Library, and in the Higher Degree by Research (HDR) Requirements.
Procedure
1. At least 3 months before thesis submission the Candidature Committee should discuss the names of a pool of 4-5 examiners with the candidate. In the case of HDR candidates whose examination involves the examination of creative outputs as well as a thesis, the examiners should be nominated prior to the examination of the creative outputs, which will normally precede the examination of thesis. In cases where the HDR candidate will be having an oral examination, please refer to the Guidelines for Conducting an Oral Examination.
2. At least 2 months before thesis submission the Primary Advisor should approach the preferred external examiners informally (see Appendix 1) to ascertain their willingness to examine the thesis. In the case of HDR candidates whose examination involves the examination of creative outputs as well as a thesis, each examiner should be available for the examination of both the creative outputs and the thesis and should be advised of the intended timing of both when approached informally by the Primary Advisor.
3. At least 1 month before thesis submission the Advisory Panel must complete and submit NEX-FORM-01 HDR Nomination of Examiners Form (PDF Version or Word Version) to the Graduate Research School for the examiners to be approved by the Dean, Graduate Research.
4. For a Research Masters degree, one (1) external examiner and one (1) internal examiner is required; for a doctoral degree at least two (2) external examiners are required (and is usual at JCU), but up to three (3) examiners may be used. A replacement examiner should also be nominated at the same time as the other examiners but their availability need not be confirmed at this time.
5. An examiner must have demonstrated research activity in the previous 5 years in a field of study relevant to the subject of the thesis.
6. At least one examiner should be a person with experience in examining Australian theses at the appropriate level.
7. No examiner should be chosen about whom the candidate has expressed concerns in writing to their College Dean or the Graduate Research School. Such concerns must be placed on the candidate’s file at the Graduate Research School.
8. Conflicts of interest in thesis examination must be explicitly addressed in order to ensure that a thesis may be assessed independently and free from any perceived or actual bias.
9. Conflicts of Interest of examiners may be with:
- the University
- any other involved institution
- a member of the Advisory Panel
- the candidate
- another examiner
and include
- working relationships
- personal relationships
- legal relationships
- business/professional/social relationships
10. Conflicts of interest may be major, which would disallow the examiner from being nominated. Conflicts of interest may also be minor. Minor conflicts must be recorded on NEX-FORM-01 HDR Nomination of Examiners Form (PDF Version or Word Version) and may in combination if there are several, disallow the approval of the nominated examiner. Please refer to Table 1 and Appendix 2 for examples of major/minor conflicts of interest.
11. If there is any doubt as to whether a Conflict of Interest exists, the matter should be referred to the Dean, Graduate Research.
Table 1: Conflicts of Interest that are major and must be avoided, or minor, in appointing the examiners of a HDR thesis. | |||||||
Nature of relationship | Working | Personal | Legal | Business | Professional | Social | Other |
Examiner – Candidate | MAJOR | MAJOR | MAJOR | MAJOR MINOR | MAJOR MINOR | MAJOR MINOR | |
Examiner – Advisory Panel | MAJOR | MAJOR | MAJOR | MAJOR MINOR | MAJOR MINOR | MAJOR MINOR | |
Examiner – University/ Involved Institution | MAJOR MINOR | MAJOR MINOR | MAJOR | ||||
Examiner – Subject Matter | MAJOR | ||||||
Examiner – Examiner | MAJOR | MAJOR | MAJOR | MAJOR |
Appendix 1 - Sample Approach Letter from Primary Advisor to External Examiners
Dear [EXAMINER’S NAME],
I am contacting you to ascertain your willingness to examine a JCU [INSERT DEGREE] thesis. The thesis is titled [TITLE] and has been written by [CANDIDATE’S NAME].A copy of a brief thesis abstract is enclosed for your information.
The thesis requires examination by two examiners of international standing who are external to JCU, who each prepare a qualitative formative report and provide summative recommendations from a designated list of options.
If you are willing to examine the thesis, the JCU Graduate Research School will approach you formally and will suggest a six (6) week turnaround time.
Please advise by return email if you are willing to examine this thesis.
Yours sincerely,
[YOUR NAME AND AFFILIATION(S)]
Appendix 2 – Examples of Conflicts of Interest
Examples of Major Conflicts of Interest Resulting in the Non-Appointment of an Examiner
1. Conflict with the Candidate
Working Relationship
- Examiner has co-authored a paper with the candidate within the last five years.
- Examiner has worked with the candidate on matters regarding the thesis, e.g. previous member of the Advisory Panel or is known to have reviewed sections of the thesis.
- Examiner has employed the candidate or been employed by the candidate within the last five years.
- Examiner is in negotiation to directly employ or be employed by the candidate.
- Examiner has acted as a referee for the candidate for employment.
Personal Relationship
- Examiner is a known relative of the candidate.
- Examiner is a friend, associate or mentor of the candidate.
- Examiner and the candidate have an existing or a previous emotional relationship, are co-residents or are members of a common household.
Legal Relationship
- Examiner is or was married to the candidate.
- Examiner is legally family to the candidate (e.g. step-father, sister-in-law).
- Examiner is either a legal guardian or dependent of the candidate or has power of attorney for the candidate.
Business, Professional and or Social Relationships
- Examiner is currently in or has had a business relationship with the candidate in the last five years (e.g. partner in a small business or employment).
- Examiner is in a social relationship with the candidate, such as God Parent or in the same sporting team.
- Examiner and candidate are on the same Committee or Board of a Professional Society
2. Conflict with the Advisory Panel
Working Relationship
- Examiner was supervised by (i.e. a candidate of) a member of the advisory panel in the past 5 years (at institution other than JCU)
- Examiner has co-supervised with a member of the Advisory Panel in the past five years.
- Examiner holds a patent with a member of the Advisory Panel granted no more than eight years ago and which is still in force.
- Examiner had directly employed or was employed by a member of the Advisory Panel in the past five years.
- External examiner is employed at the same Institution as any member of the Advisory Panel.
- Examiner currently holds, or has held within the past five (5) years, a grant with a member of the Advisory Panel (mitigating circumstances may exist, for example, a large, multidisciplinary team where interactions were minimal).
- Examiner has co-authored a publication with a member of the Advisory Panel in the past five years (this is a severe case of Conflict of Interest but mitigating circumstances may exist, e.g. the examiner and member of the Advisory Panel are both authors of a multi-authored paper but have had no direct contact. The examiner and/or the member of the Advisory panel must not have been lead/senior authors for this to be considered mitigating circumstances).
- Examiner is currently examining another thesis for a member of Advisory Panel or a member of the Advisory Panel is currently examining a thesis of a candidate supervised by the examiner.
Personal Relationship
- Examiner is in negotiation to directly employ or be employed by a member of the Advisory Panel.
- Examiner is a known relative of a member of the candidate's Advisory Panel.
- Examiner and a member of the candidate's Advisory Panel have an existing or a previous emotional relationship, are co-residents or are members of a common household.
Legal Relationship
- Examiner is or was married to a member of the candidate's Advisory Panel.
- Examiner is legally family of a member of the candidate's Advisory Panel (e.g. step-father, sister-in-law).
- Examiner is either a legal guardian or dependent of a member of the candidate's Advisory Panel or has power of attorney for a member of the Advisory Panel.
- Business, Professional and or Social Relationships
- Examiner is currently in or has had a business relationship with a member of the Advisory Panel in the last five years (e.g. partner is a small business or employment).
- Examiner is in a social relationship with member of the Advisory Panel, such as a God Parent or membership of the same sporting team.
3. Conflict with the University or any Involved Institution (External examinations only)
Working Relationship
- Examiner is currently in negotiation with the University or an Involved Institution for a work contract (other than examining a thesis).
- Other Relationship
- Examiner has received an Honorary Doctorate from the University or an Involved Institution within the past five years or is a candidate for such a degree.
- Examiner has graduated from the University or an Involved Institution within the past five years.
- Examiner has/had a formal grievance with the University or an Involved Institution.
Professional Relationship
- Examiner is a current member of staff of the University or an Involved Institution or has a current Honorary, Adjunct or Emeritus position with the University or an Involved Institution or has had such a position during the candidature of the candidate or in the past five (5) years (mitigating circumstances may exist).
4. Conflict with the Subject Matter
- Examiner has a direct commercial interest in the outcomes of the research.
- Examiner has a fundamental objection to the research paradigm adopted in the thesis that is apparent on reading the abstract.
5. Conflict with Other Examiners
- An examiner does not normally know the identity of the other examiners. The potential Conflicts of Interest listed below should be taken into account in appointing examiners.
- Examiner works in the same department/school as another examiner.
- Examiner is married to, closely related to or has a close personal of business relationship with another examiner.
Examples of Minor Conflicts of Interest that should be referred to the Graduate Research School
These following conflicts of interest are considered minor in isolation and would not normally inhibit the appointment of an examiner. However, several conflicts of interest that are individually minor may in combination be considered major.
6. Conflict with the Candidate
Business, Professional and or Social Relationships
- Examiner has a current professional relationship, such as shared membership of a Board or Committee with the candidate (including editorial, advisory and grant decision boards).
- Examiner has had personal contact with the candidate that may give rise to the perception that the examiner may be dealing with the candidate in a less than objective manner.
- Examiner was the “Expert Reviewer” for the candidate’s Confirmation of Candidature Research Proposal.
7. Conflict with the Advisory Panel
Business, Professional and or Social Relationships
- Examiner has a current professional relationship, such as shared membership of a Board of Committee with a member of the Advisory Panel (including editorial and grant decision boards).
- Examiner has had personal contact with a member of the Advisory Panel that may give rise to the perception that the examiner may be dealing with the candidate in a less than objective manner.
- Examiner was the “Expert Reviewer” for the candidate’s Confirmation of Candidature Research Proposal.
8. Conflict with the University (External examiners only)
Working Relationship
- Examiner is currently working for the University or an Involved Institution pro bono (e.g. on a review).
- Examiner has examined for the University two or more times in the past 12 months and/or five or more times in the past five years (mitigating circumstances may involve examination for candidates across different organisational units of the university). Multiple use of one examiner by an Advisory Panel will not be approved).
Professional Relationship
- Examiner has a current professional relationship with the University or an Involved Institution (e.g., membership of a Board or Committee).
- Examiner has a current visiting position with the University or an Involved Institution or has had such a position during the candidature of a Board or Committee.
9. Conflict with Other Examiners
Professional Relationship
- Examiner has a professional relationship with another examiner.
Related policy instruments
Schedules/Appendices
Administration
NOTE: Printed copies of this procedure are uncontrolled, and currency can only be assured at the time of printing.
Approval Details
Policy Domain | Research Education |
Policy Sponsor | Deputy Vice Chancellor, Research |
Approval Authority | Deputy Vice Chancellor, Research |
Date for next Major Review | April 2022 |
Modification History
Version no. | Approval date | Implementation date | Details |
21-1 | 10/12/2021 | 10/12/2021 | Minor amendment to working relationship wording |
19-1 | 09/04/2019 | 18/04/2019 | Amended to incorporate Masters requirements.Specified conflict of interest types for external examiners only. |
17-1 | Merged Conflict of Interest and Nomination of Examiners Procedure |
Keywords | |
Contact person | Dean, Graduate Research |