This procedure elaborates the Confirmation of Candidature section of the Higher Degree by Research (HDR) Requirements.
1. To demonstrate that the Candidate’s proposed project is of a suitable scope and standard for the degree;
2. To demonstrate that the Candidate has the capacity to: (a) complete the proposed project in a timely manner with the resources available and the potential to obtain any required permits and (b) undertake a degree at the required level by demonstrating:
This procedure applies to Candidates for the research higher degrees offered by the University.
Terms mentioned in this document and not defined here are defined in the Policy Glossary in the Learning and Teaching domain of the University Policy Library, and in the Higher Degree by Research (HDR) Requirements.
1.1 Candidates must aim to have their candidature confirmed when they have consumed 0.5 EFTSL (6 months full time equivalent) of provisional Doctorate candidature or 0.33 EFTSL (4 months full time equivalent) of provisional Research Masters candidature. Students can be granted an extension of a further 0.5 EFTSL (PhD) or 0.33 EFTSL (Masters) under special circumstances by Variation of Candidature Form.
1.2 Successful completion of the Confirmation of Candidature Process requires the Candidate receive the grade of “pass” for each of RD7001/RM7001 and RD7002/RM7002, and to complete all the requirements for this milestone as detailed in the relevant forms.
1.3 The Candidate must prepare the materials required for assessment at the Confirmation of Candidature Milestone. The required materials are:
1.3.2 Written work - complete COC-FORM-02 for RD7002/RM7002 ‘Situating the Research’ which must be a literature review of some or all of the proposed topic of the research or other synthesis consistent with the RD7002/RM7002 Subject Outline.
1.3.3 Public Presentation – a public seminar on the research proposal, the assessment of which is recorded on COC-FORM-01.
1.3.4 Compulsory components of HDR Professional Development, and HDR Professional Development Audit and Plan, to be assessed on COC-FORM-02.
1.5 The Candidate, through their Primary Advisor, should ask the Responsible Administrative Officer in their College to organise the seminar and the post-seminar meeting of the Candidature Committee.
1.6 Six weeks before the seminar, the Candidate must provide each member of their Candidature Committee, material from clause 1.3.1 so that it can be sent to an expert reviewer.
1.7 The Primary Advisor must review, and must obtain an independent expert review of the written proposal component of the Planning the Research subject RD7001/RM7001 using COC-FORM-01. The expert reviewer must be external to JCU. An “expert” in this case is defined as a person who has at a minimum, published in the area of the proposed research. A link to the expert reviewer’s research profile should be provided to the Candidature Committee and ADRE.
1.8 The Candidate must revise their proposal in accordance with the expert review, and record the amendments on COC-FORM-01.
1.9 At least one week before the seminar the Candidate must provide to the Responsible Academic Officer their revised proposal (COC-FORM-01), and the other written items listed in 1.3 unless the Advisory Panel and that Candidate have agreed that the Candidate will not attempt to finalise RD7002/RM7002 concurrently with RD/RM 7001.
1.11 The seminar must be delivered in person and viewed by all members of the Candidature Committee. Others should be encouraged to attend unless such an arrangement is precluded by a confidentiality agreement. The presentation should be no longer than 30 minutes excluding questions and should detail the research proposal.
1.12 The Candidature Committee must meet to complete COC-FORM-03 and advise the Candidate of the recommendation of the Confirmation of Candidature Milestone. The decision about the recommendation of the process will be made by the Chair of the Candidature Committee and the Independent Academic. The Advisors and the Candidate should not be present when this decision is made. The signatures of the Candidate and the Advisors must be obtained subsequent to the decision having been explained to them, in acknowledgement that they have been advised of the recommendation. The Candidature Committee may recommend that the Confirmation of Candidature milestone be passed or failed. Not passing one or both of RD7001/RM7001 and RD7002/RM7002 constitutes a fail.
1.13 A Candidate who wishes to request a review of the recommendation of their Confirmation of Candidature, may submit an appeal in writing to the Manager, Graduate Research Operations within 20 working days of signing COC-FORM-01, COC-FORM-02 and COC-FORM-03. The milestone recommendation review will be assessed by two Associate Deans of Research Education from Colleges other than that of the Candidate. The two Associate Deans of Research Education who are assessing the review may obtain additional expert review and interview any people involved if they wish to do so.
In submitting a request for a review of a milestone recommendation, the Candidate must provide evidence for why a recommendation should be rescinded. Such a case would at the very least include evidence of inconsistencies between assessments of milestone components, by for example the Chair of Candidature Committee, Independent Academic, any expert reviewers, and the Advisory Panel.
The decision of the review of a milestone recommendation may be to support or rescind the recommendation for that milestone and will be communicated to the Candidate within 20 working days of submitting the appeal.
1.15 The Dean, Graduate Research will approve the final recommendation of the Confirmation of Candidature Milestone.
1.16 The Graduate Research School will communicate the Dean’s approved course of action to the Candidate and the Candidature Committee.
1.17 A Candidate who fails the Confirmation of Candidature milestone, or exceeds the maximum times stipulated in clause 1.1 without an approved extension will be placed Under Review.
Dean, Graduate Research
Date for next review:
Refer to subjects and new forms.
Appeal of result to occur within college prior to submission of form to GRS.
Unsatisfactory leads to “Under Review”
No Merit Review.
Changed appeal process. Change to Under Review clause.
Added requirement for CAA-FORM-01. Changed appeal process.
Expert Reviewer must be external to JCU
|Candidates should aim to complete their confirmation in 6 months|